Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(10)
Imaging studies have shown that frontal activity is significantly higher in trials with successful elimination of distracter interference on participants' memory performance [1] [2].
The AF7 response was significantly higher in trials with paramecia (p = 9.6 × 10−5, Wilcoxon rank sum test), whereas the AF9 response was not significantly different (p = 0.083).
First, simple spike suppression was on average 22% higher in trials with a CR compared to those without, in a linear mixed-effects regression (p < 0.0001; Table S1A; see Experimental Procedures).
The reporting of ethical approval but not the quality of the consent process appears higher in trials in which other methodological quality markers and journal endorsement of reporting quality were also high.
The risk reduction of stroke, angina, and heart failure was higher in trials at high risk of bias compared with those at low risk of bias (though directionally similar) (table 3).
3 Some participants' characteristics are asymmetrically distributed between the study arms despite randomization; and the likelihood of imbalance is higher in trials with a small sample and when randomization procedures are not followed properly.
Similar(50)
Similarly mycological cure rates were significantly higher in trial 1 (62% vs 50%) but not in trial 2 (61% vs 60%).
It is notable that both soil Si and pH were appreciably higher in Trial 2 treatments compared with their equivalents in Trial 1 (Table 2; Fig. 1).
The overall negative skew in attractiveness differences suggests that participants, especially men, tended to rate cards higher in trial 1 relative to trial 2. Our results provide support for our two hypotheses.
The results partly support our prediction that HR would be elevated on discovery of a downshifted reward because the HR of contrast birds was higher in trial 7 than trial 5.
At 6 and 18 months, the mean value of 6MWD were significantly higher in trial group compared with the control group (FAS: P = 0.004, P = 0.009; PPS: P = 0.003, P = 0.009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com