Sentence examples for higher disparities from inspiring English sources

The map depicts where the most powerful and powerless citizens live; what factors make them score higher; disparities across and within regions; and which political parties represent the powerless and powerful.

Such information can help identify populations with lower vaccination coverage and higher disparities between different racial/ethnic groups.

Similarly to Disparity A, the constraint hypothesis would predict that strong modules would have significantly lower disparities than observed in random sets of landmarks from weak modules, and that weak modules would have significantly higher disparities than observed in random sets of landmarks from strong modules.

Finally, discrimination adds another layer of disadvantage that might contribute to higher disparities, particularly among racialised groups.

For example, there is low inequity for immunization and antenatal care, while higher disparities exist for skilled attendance coverage.

Higher disparities still remain in pockets of resistance particularly in rural areas of Upper Egypt (BeniSweif, Minia, Assiut, Fayoum, Sohag, Beheira, and Giza) where gender gap ranges from 10% in Minya to 7% in Fayoum.

Contrary to the constraint hypothesis, the molar module displayed significantly higher disparity than random sets of landmarks for both Disparity A and B in Carnivora.

The four Canadian studies noted for having higher disparity rates included two mortality studies (Peters et al. 2013; Oliver et al. 2012), two examining hospitalization rates (Oliver and Kohen, 2012) and one showing both injury outcomes (Alaghehbandan et al. 2010).

In Carnivora, the molar group had marginally significantly higher disparity than the random sets of "weak" module landmarks (p = 0.05), while the orbit, zygomatic-pterygoid, and vault groups all had significantly or marginally significantly higher disparity than the random sets of "strong" module landmarks (p<0.001, p<0.001, and p = 0.03, respectively).

In Primates, the basicranial group had significantly lower disparity than the random sets of "weak" module landmarks (p = 0.002), while the zygomatic-pterygoid group had a significantly higher disparity than the random sets of "strong" modules (p<0.001).

In Carnivora, these three "weak" modules displayed significantly higher disparity than that of randomly-generated sets of traits in five out of six analyses (Table 2, Disparity A and B).