Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
The results from the present cohort study support an association between higher consumption frequency or higher alcohol intake and the risk of gastric cancer among men.
RTEC consumption was associated with a higher consumption frequency of fruit and milk, a more beneficial daily micronutrient intake, a healthier DQI and less breakfast skipping.
For the first time in a multi-centre European adolescent sample, RTEC consumption has been associated with better dietary habits: a healthier daily diet quality, a more beneficial micronutrients intake (but no difference in macronutrients), a higher consumption frequency of milk and fruit and less breakfast skipping.
Similar(57)
The highest consumption frequencies were found in surgical (81.6 %) and medical (55.2 %) intensive care units.
Foods with high consumption frequencies on a weekly basis included mustard greens (79.4%), katuk (77.2%), cattle meat (70.1%), water spinach (60.8%), and lean pork (62%) The weekly consumption frequencies of some high-risk foods decreased significantly compared to those in the pre-intervention survey.
Our study found a higher milk/yoghurt consumption frequency and quantity in RTEC consumers over the day; daily RTEC consumers even had 2.65 times more chance to fulfil the daily milk intake recommendation [ 39].
Men within the group of the highest alcohol consumption frequency had a twofold increased risk of gastric cancer compared with occasional drinkers.
After adjustment for smoking, education level and body mass index, the HR of gastric cancer was 2.00 (95% CI: 1.04 3.82) for the highest alcohol consumption frequency (2 7 times per week) compared with occasional drinking (a few times per year) and 1.90 (95% CI: 1.13 3.18) for ≥100.0 g ethanol/week versus 0.1 9.9 g ethanol/week.
Consumption frequency was the highest between the ages of 18 and 30.
Obviously, higher market integration for introduced foods was not associated with reduced consumption frequency of traditional foods.
Higher consumption?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com