"higher assessment" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you would like to describe the process of evaluating or judging something based on increased or higher standards or scrutiny. For example: The professor gave a higher assessment of the student's essay than he did for the other essays in the class.
Mr. Henry said that a higher assessment would help in financing the project.
It would have to hire about 40 new people to do filings properly, charge clients more and pay "much higher" assessment fees.
year 2014 with a market share of 44percentthatat includes some Common Core instructional materials, and a $13 million increase in higher assessment net sales.
In his letter to the Department of Investigation, Mr. Goldstein cited three "high-value" Manhattan office buildings represented by Lippman Krasnow & Kelton, where even "a cursory analysis" might justify a higher assessment, although he said he had no evidence of a crime.
If not, then the conclusion is that their off-season home in the Hamptons is being paid for, in part, by the owner of their Avenue A building and, in part, by all other New York taxpayers (with a higher rent roll, the Avenue A building would carry a higher assessment for real estate tax purposes and the building owner would have higher income, leading to higher business or corporate tax).
This will not only raise their dues, but will also force them to calculate their tax bill twice, since Americans must pay whichever is the higher assessment of their tax burden under either the standard code or the AMT one.Mr Rangel's plan tries to deal with the second great unavoidable (he says nothing about what to do with the Bush tax cuts, a serious omission).
And higher assessments, he said, mean higher taxes for unit owners.
Those with higher assessments and paying $4,600, for example, would pay $7,000.
Those figures are subject to corrections and appeals, and officials expect a flood of challenges from people who face higher assessments or are simply confused.
But the exemption would apply to higher assessments resulting from renovations costing more than $3,000 that first-time buyers made to existing homes.
The lawsuit charged that because the county's assessment system is based on 1938 building costs and pre-1964 land values instead of current market value, it results in disproportionately higher assessments and taxes in black and Latino areas.
