Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
For Guachinte and Nechí coal ash and sulphur rejection were high (90.3% and 88.5%) and (71.3% and 73.8%) respectively at acidic conditions (pH 4 and 5) with Jg in the range of 1.4 to 1.8 cm/s, whereas Cerrejón and Jagua coals exhibited high values of ash (85.4% and 94.7%) and sulphur rejection (81.1% and 85.1%) at alkali conditions (pH 9 and 10) with Jg in the range of 1.0 to 1.4 cm/s.
Similar(59)
1 For ash and phytic acid the equivalence intervals are not trustworthy, because the estimate of the variance between reference genotypes was 0 and sed GR 2 is based on lower strata (note also the high values of df GR 2 ).
Points where a thin ash layer was observed are characterized by high value of the recovery slope whereas a thicker ash layer corresponds to a lower value of slope recovery indices.
Tc returns a high value for ash-affected vegetation and its value decreases with vegetation recovery.
Wood ash had the highest values of K, Ca and Mg followed by poultry manure and rice bran, respectively.
The highest values of the NRM (>25 μAm2/kg) likely correspond to samples containing ash particles (although care was taken to sample away from the ash layers).
The application of wood ash resulted in the highest values of soil pH, Ca and Mg compared to other treatments, while moderate values of soil pH, K, Ca and low % N were obtained with rice bran.
The highest values of soil pH, Ca and Mg were obtained under wood ash application, while the highest values of soil O.M and moderate values of soil P, K, Ca and Mg were obtained under poultry manure application.
The highest values of cabbage head yield parameters were obtained with poultry manure followed by wood ash and rice bran, respectively.
Higher values of TDS at location #11 and 12 may be attributed to addition of sewage and suspension of ashes from cremation ground near the locations.
The test data revealed that for sea sand based geopolymer concrete, the compressive strength reached high values at an alkaline to fly ash ratio of 0.35 0.45.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com