high standard for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "high standard for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe a lofty or demanding expectation. For example, "The company has a high standard for customer service excellence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I have a high standard for excellence.

The New York Times

I'd set a high standard for myself.

The Guardian - Books

James on Main set a high standard for service.

The New York Times - Travel

She has set a high standard for us to follow.

University of California, Berkeley

Mr. Domingo sets a high standard for the singers.

The New York Times - Arts

However, UK law sets a very high standard for denying licenses to broadcasters.

The Guardian

But the league has also established a high standard for its own internal mechanisms of oversight.

The New Yorker

His legacy as a scientist, leader, and adviser will set a high standard for coming generations.

The New York Times

"Dispatches" set a high standard for reporters, but it set them free.

The New York Times - Books

By condemning hypocrisy so relentlessly, the filmmakers are setting a high standard for themselves.

The New York Times - Arts

Baker and Manuel have set a high standard for the two newcomers.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "high standard for", ensure that the context clearly specifies what the standard applies to. For instance, "The company maintains a "high standard for" customer satisfaction" provides clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "high standard for" without specifying the area or aspect. Saying "They have a "high standard for" everything" is vague and unhelpful. Always specify what the standard relates to.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "high standard for" primarily functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun to indicate a demanding expectation or level of quality. Ludwig AI confirms this phrase is grammatically sound and frequently used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Academia

22%

Science

12%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "high standard for" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase to express demanding expectations or levels of quality. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, its neutral register makes it suitable for various contexts, particularly in news, academic, and professional settings. To avoid vagueness, always specify what the "high standard for" applies to. For example, say "The company maintains a "high standard for" customer satisfaction" instead of "They have a "high standard for" everything". Alternatives include "stringent criteria for", "exacting demands for", and "lofty expectations for", which can be used based on the specific nuance you want to convey.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stringent criteria for

Emphasizes the strictness and precision of the requirements.

exacting demands for

Highlights the rigorous and challenging nature of the expectations.

lofty expectations for

Focuses on the ambitious and elevated nature of the hopes or requirements.

rigorous requirements for

Stresses the thorough and demanding process involved.

demanding criteria for

Underscores the challenging and exacting nature of the standards.

elevated benchmarks for

Implies that the standards are set considerably above the average or norm.

premium expectations for

Highlights the superior quality or performance that is anticipated.

stringent demands for

Stresses the strictness of needs or necessities, with limited tolerance for deviation.

high benchmarks for

Uses a term commonly found in organizational and project management contexts.

challenging requirements for

Emphasizes the difficulty and complexity in fulfilling the specified standards.

FAQs

How can I use "high standard for" in a sentence?

You can use "high standard for" to describe expectations or requirements. For example, "The university has a "high standard for" research publications" or "The company set a "high standard for" employee performance".

What are some alternatives to "high standard for"?

Some alternatives include "stringent criteria for", "exacting demands for", or "lofty expectations for", depending on the specific context.

Is it better to say "high standard for" or "high standards in"?

While both are grammatically correct, "high standard for" is often used when referring to a specific area or aspect, whereas "high standards in" might be used more generally. For example, "high standard for quality control" versus "high standards in education".

What does it mean to "set a high standard for" something?

To "set a high standard for" something means to establish a demanding level of quality or performance that others are expected to meet. It implies creating a benchmark that is challenging but achievable.