Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(13)
The high sequestration scenario is on the other hand assumed to represent the INDC mitigation scenario development.
The high sequestration efficiency has been confirmed in a number of modeling studies, as noted in a recent IPCC special report on CO2 capture and storage[3].
Supported polysaccharides on glass beads synthesized in water by a single step reaction show high sequestration capacity of citrate-coated Ag NP in aqueous media.
It is assumed that the INDC target is consistent with the projections provided in the 6th National Communication, i.e. low and high sequestration scenarios.
Following the high sequestration scenario, the net LULUCF sink is expected to be increased by roughly 32 Mt CO2e year−1 in 2030, as compared to 2010 levels.
The 6th National Communication provides two scenarios (high sequestration and low sequestration scenarios) for LULUCF emission levels development by 2030 [38].
Similar(47)
Reported soil C sequestration rates globally show that under best management practices, 4 per mille or even higher sequestration rates can be accomplished.
This would save water through higher water-use efficiency, and lead to accumulation of more carbon in soil with higher sequestration potential, besides giving sustainable production through maize-wheat system over the years.
Thus each point in a supply curve represents the regional sum of the average annual carbon sequestration potential of a grid cell assigned to a time interval [t s, t t ], starting with the most productive grid cells (i.e. cells with highest sequestration rate per hectare), ending with ineffective grid cells.
At day 5, however, a higher sequestration of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells was observed in H3R−/− mice as compared to C57BL/6 mice (p = 0.04).
FACS phenotyping, extended to other inflammatory cell lineages, revealed an increase in the numbers of macrophages/monocytes (CD11b+-GR1 lowithith a significantly higher sequestration in H3R−/− mice that occurred relatively late at day 5 post-infection (p = 0.046).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com