Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(3)
Another possible selection bias is the fact that respondents with high risk of obstructive sleep apnea were oversampled.
Respondents with high risk of obstructive sleep apnea according to the Berlin Questionnaire were oversampled, resulting in obstructive sleep apnea occurring in 55.5% (296/533) of the participants.
A positive score in at least two of the three categories are required to classify a person as high risk of obstructive sleep apnea.
Similar(57)
We also found a dose-dependent relationship between areca nut chewing and CAD risk, as a higher amount of areca nut chewing was associated with a higher risk of obstructive CAD.
In 2008, Asian Americans had a higher age-adjusted prevalence of diabetes (8.2%) than Whites (7.0%) [ 14], and for any given weight, they also appear to have a higher risk of obstructive sleep apnea compared to Whites [ 15].
Subjects who chewed Lao-hwa had a relatively higher risk of obstructive CAD (adjusted OR = 5.1; 95% CI = 1.9-13.6), compared to those chewing betel leaf (adjusted OR = 2.7; 95% CI = 1.3-5.7 1.3-5.7 2).
Rates of scoring at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea were compared.
Subjects were considered to be at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea if ≥2 of 3 symptom categories were positive.
In this pilot study, a high proportion of Barrett's esophagus subjects scored at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea.
In summary, the findings from this pilot study demonstrate that a high proportion of Barrett's esophagus patients score at high risk for obstructive sleep apnea.
When pulmonary dysfunction was characterized according to restrictive and obstructive ventilatory impairment, age-adjusted analyses showed that women and men with prevalent vertebral fracture had higher risk of severe obstructive ventilatory impairment than those with no vertebral fracture, odds ratio (OR) 5.18 in women (P = 0.029) and 2.72 in men (P = 0.003) (Table 6).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com