The phrase "high overall quality" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It is typically used when describing something as having a high level of quality in general, without specifying one particular aspect. Example: The restaurant is known for its high overall quality, from the food to the service to the ambiance.
None of the 74 drugs showed evidence of high overall quality.
RIN values of all samples ranged from 7.5-8.5 7.5-8.5ing low variability and high overall quality.
Reports of high overall quality, with few shortcomings, will score 4 or 5. Previously the ISQ has mainly been used by studies evaluating health reporting in newspapers.
Six studies reached very high overall quality [ 2, 34, 35, 37, 39, 41], nine studies reached high overall quality [ 4, 19, 21, 33, 36, 38, 40], and the other three studies reached median overall quality [ 31, 32, 42], no study reached low overall quality.
We assigned reports with low overall quality (corresponding to low quality for several ISQ criteria) a score of 1 or 2, and reports with high overall quality (corresponding to high quality for several ISQ criteria) a score of 4 or 5.
Of the 18 guidelines reviewed, only the recent UK (NICE, 2008), Dutch (CBO, 2007) and Finnish (FCCG, 2007) guidelines, and the UK urological cancer services guidance (NICE, 2002), are of high overall quality according to the AGREE Collaboration's rating scheme, indicating that they could be considered for use in practice without provisos or alterations.
This is why the NICE CGs obtained the higher overall quality score, but with the lower agreement among reviewers (Tables 1 and2).
Overall, professionals from outpatient services specialized in pediatric headache assigned higher overall quality scores to the NICE CGs compared to those who do not work in similar structures (6.86 ± 0.38 vs 6.0 ± 0.82; p = 0.038).
Statistical analyses showed that professionals from outpatient services specialized in pediatric headache assigned higher overall quality scores to the NICE CGs compared to those who do not work in similar structures (6.86 ± 0.38 vs 6.0 ± 0.82; p = 0.038).
Statistical analyses showed that professionals from outpatient services dedicated pediatric headache assigned a higher overall quality score to the NICE CGs as compared to professionals from non-outpatient services (6.86 ± 0.38 vs 6.0 ± 0.82; p = 0.038).
We selected the SeqMan assembly due to its higher overall quality relative to the Newbler assembly.
