Sentence examples for high involvement group from inspiring English sources

For the high involvement group, intrinsic criteria significantly influenced satisfaction (β = .36, t = 4.01, p < .01).01

Contrary to high involvement group, in low involvement group, consumers who put more emphasis on intrinsic criteria tended to dissatisfy with knitwear products.

Similar to the high involvement group, the low involvement group showed a significant, positive relationship between intrinsic criteria and satisfaction (β = .26, t = 2.67, p < .01).01

For both high and low involvement groups, intrinsic criteria had a significant impact on satisfaction, indicating the importance of intrinsic attributes while high involvement group showed bigger positive effect of intrinsic criteria on satisfaction.

Regarding the relationship between evaluative criteria and dissatisfaction, in high involvement group, consumers who considered economic criteria as important were likely to dissatisfy with knitwear products, while the relationship was not significant in low involvement group.

Different from the high involvement group and the hypothesized direction of the relationship, intrinsic criteria significantly, positively influenced dissatisfaction in the low involvement group (β = .44, t = 3.96, p < .01).01

To determine whether differences in nutrition knowledge affected how women (a high-involvement group) interpreted intrinsic cues (ingredient list) and extrinsic cues ("all natural" label) on food labels.

The relationship between economic criteria and dissatisfaction was significantly stronger in the high knitwear involvement group than in the low knitwear involvement group (χ2diff.

Chi-squared tests of differences between the high and low knitwear involvement group were conducted with the partial invariance model as the baseline model.

As mentioned before, for both high and low involvement groups, satisfaction and dissatisfaction may be explained well with expectation and disconfirmation (Bearden and Teel 1983; Oliver 1993) or congruity between expectation and outcome (Chon and Olsen 1991) rather than evaluative criteria though evaluative criteria have previously been researched to explain satisfaction and dissatisfaction.

The relationship between intrinsic criteria and dissatisfaction was significantly stronger in the low knitwear involvement group than in the high knitwear involvement group (χ2diff.