Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The centre of the treated tumour may also appear high in CT density due to severe cellular disruption[ 51 ].
Similar(59)
Results revealed that CT and SRI gave statistically at par grain yield but straw yield was significantly higher in CT as compared to SRI.
The residual NO3 N content (0 90 cm) was significantly higher in CT than in NT, the opposite occurring with grain yield.
Percentage of responders was higher in CT than in BoNT-A group (CT=62% vs BoNT-A= 38%).
Leaf N concentration was higher in CT than NT and ST, but plant height, stem diameter, and dry weight were similar across all treatments.
TLR2 expression was significantly higher in CT in each pStage of cancer as well.
TLR2 expression was significantly higher in CT than in NCT for any pStage (Table 3b).
TLR2 expression was significantly higher in CT than in NCT in both the distal and proximal colon (distal colon: P < 0.001; proximal colon: P < 0.05, Table 3c).
There was no significant difference in TLR4 expression between NCT and CT in the distal part of the colon, but was higher in CT than in NCT in the proximal part of the colon (P < 0.05; Table 3c).
TLR2 expression was significantly higher in CT than in NCT (P < 0.001; Table 3a).> -wrap-foot> Dare are shown as mean ± SD * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P < 0.001 TLR2 and 4 expression was compared between NCT and CT according to pStage.
The average number of place fields per place cell was slightly higher in CT compared to KO mice, but this relationship was not affected by the additional experience of animals on the novel track (CT vs KO: 1.76 vs 1.52 in DisjRun1 and 1.76 vs 1.47 in DisjRun2, p<0.002).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com