Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(6)
Fisher's exact tests were performed to compare schools with stable high implementation levels with schools with low or unstable implementation.
Schools with stable high implementation levels over time were characterised by context, intervention appreciation and implementation of other components.
School and class level: An increase in schools with high implementation levels was detected when aggregating teacher data (from 5too 6 schools).
We found no clear pattern concerning whether schools were improving and doing well for all process measures (Table 3), although some schools had stable high implementation levels or improvements for several process measures compared to other schools.
School level data: Only few schools (4 concerning fruit and 1 concerning vegetables) were categorised as having high implementation levels in terms of variety according to the pupils (Table 2).
In summary, there is a lack of knowledge about the implementation level of strategies to increase availability and accessibility of FV to adolescents at schools, the reach of strategies in different subgroups of pupils; changes in implementation level over time, and characteristics of schools with high implementation levels.
Similar(54)
High implementation level was defined pragmatically as 80% or more, as no schools had implemented 100% of the components.
School level: Compared to the number of schools with a high implementation level of variation in vegetable delivery, twice as many schools had a high implementation level of variation in the delivered fruits (14 versus 7).
What characterises schools with a stable high implementation level of intervention components during the entire intervention period?
Schools with stable high implementation level (SH): The implementation level was high (≥80%) at both times of assessments (the ideal situation).
School level: The number of schools with a high implementation level decreased (from 12 to 6 schools) from the beginning to the end of the intervention period.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com