Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The show was the first to be resurrected because of high DVD sales.
Similar(58)
Aim for high DVs (20percentt or more) in vitamins and minerals, such as vitamin D and potassium and low (5percentt or less) in added sugars and sodium.
The high DV mirror this finding.
The comparably high DV found for Fagus are in agreement with the observation that (molecular) evolution in this genus is non-treelike in general [ 23, 30].
Therefore, if a domain occurs frequently as a single domain protein, it is likely to have a high DV I. Some domains may be more prone to be rearranged by a specific genomic mechanism.
Accordingly, the ITS data accumulated a high amount of incompatible signals [ 24, 31], which interfere with phylogenetic tree-building and result in high DV, but can be handled using adapted analyses, as done in [ 31] and the present study.
Also, other domains such as Sushi or the Receptor L domain which are very frequent have a low DV I. Domains with a high DV I include several transcription related genes such as Zinc finger, bZIP or basic helix-loop-helix domain (bHLH), but also the caspase recruitment domain (CARD), chaperone domain DnaJ and different transferase domains (Tab. 2).
While we could see that protein domains from the same Pfam clan do indeed have similar DV I values, we were not able to show that domains that have either a low or a high DV I have a particular functional assignment, i.e. common GO annotations.
Twin A presented an unaltered growth pattern (EFW <10 percentile) and a persistent oligohydramnios (LVP-AF of 12 mm) along with normal UA-PI (1.19), MCA-PI (1.6) and STV (6.3 msec); of note, right cardiac sections appeared dilated and an abnormally high DV-PIV (1.1) was recorded, although with no evidence of reverse flow (Fig. 1 Panel a).
We also wanted to know whether domains with a certain function have a higher DV I.
The highest DV value is 5, which indicates 100% C5 phenotypes, while lowest is -4, which represents 100% V4 phenotypes.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com