Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
hierarchy for choices
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "hierarchy for choices" is correct and usable in written English.
It is used when you want to describe a system of preferences or a structure of decisions in which each option is ranked in order of importance. For example, you could say, "We used a hierarchy for choices to identify which projects should receive priority funding this year."
✓ Grammatically correct
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
"The new framework imposes a hierarchy of choices, and culling is right at the bottom.
News & Media
A hierarchy of choice holds for traditional healers.
Other than Ulysses I wish that lists such as this did not also suggest hierarchy of choice.
News & Media
At the next level of hierarchy, the choices of hyper-priors for all variance parameters (left( {sigma^{2}_{beta },sigma^{2}_{v} ,sigma^{2}_{u} ,sigma^{2}_{delta } right)) were assumed to be uniformly distributed (i.e. (Uleft( {0,10} right))).
Science
Again, look online for choices.
Wiki
About the social hierarchy, for one thing.
News & Media
"And the hierarchy of beauty for black women is different from the hierarchy for white women.
News & Media
We present an abstraction hierarchy for LLHA.
This is a kind of machismo, an invocation of hierarchy for hierarchy's sake.
News & Media
The hierarchy for accents became apparent at school too.
News & Media
Figure 2 Temporal Hierarchy for Zooming.
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When presenting a "hierarchy for choices", clearly define the criteria used to establish the order. This makes the decision-making process transparent and justifiable.
Common error
Avoid assuming the audience understands the basis of your "hierarchy for choices". Always articulate the principles that determine the ranking to prevent misinterpretation or perceived bias.
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "hierarchy for choices" functions as a noun phrase. It describes a structured system or arrangement where options are ranked or ordered based on specific criteria. This facilitates a systematic approach to decision-making, where the most suitable choice can be identified.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "hierarchy for choices" describes a structured ranking system designed to facilitate decision-making. Ludwig AI indicates that it is grammatically correct, yet examples are scarce, suggesting infrequent usage. Effective use of this phrase involves clearly defining the criteria for ranking options to ensure transparency and avoid ambiguity. Alternative phrasing, such as "prioritized selection process" or "order of preference", can add nuance depending on the context. While its register is generally neutral to professional, awareness of context is vital. Clear articulation of criteria ensures effective communication when employing this phrase.
More alternative expressions(6)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
selection hierarchy
Inverts the original phrase while retaining the core meaning of a ranked order for selecting.
order of preference
Highlights the element of personal taste or liking in the arrangement of choices.
prioritized choices
Focuses on the choices themselves as being arranged according to their importance.
structured choice system
Emphasizes the formalized aspect of the choice-making process, using "system" to imply a deliberate structure.
ranked options
Focuses on the outcome of the structuring process, highlighting the list of options as they are ordered.
organized option ranking
Emphasizes the act of organizing and ranking potential options.
prioritized selection process
Emphasizes the act of selecting based on a pre-established order of importance, rather than simply having a ranked list.
systematic choice arrangement
Highlights the methodical nature of organizing choices.
tiered decision-making
Highlights the process of making decisions in levels or stages, each with its own set of choices.
graded selection criteria
Focuses on the criteria used to evaluate and rank the choices.
FAQs
How can I effectively use "hierarchy for choices" in decision-making?
Start by identifying all available options, then establish clear, objective criteria for ranking them. Apply the criteria consistently to create a transparent and justifiable "hierarchy for choices".
What are some alternatives to using the phrase "hierarchy for choices"?
Consider using phrases like "prioritized selection process", "ranked options", or "order of preference" depending on the specific context.
Is "hierarchy of choices" grammatically different from "hierarchy for choices"?
While both phrases are grammatically correct, "hierarchy of choices" generally refers to an existing, inherent structure, whereas "hierarchy for choices" suggests a structure created for the purpose of selection.
In what situations is it most appropriate to implement a "hierarchy for choices"?
A "hierarchy for choices" is particularly useful when faced with numerous options and limited resources, requiring a systematic approach to prioritize and select the most suitable ones.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
60%
Authority and reliability
3.8/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested