Sentence examples for helpfulness rating from inspiring English sources

Conversely, identifying methods which have a low helpfulness rating could inform policy decisions and research priorities.

This greater interest may have led to inflation in the rating of attitudes and "helpfulness" ratings of the various teaching methods.

Reviewer experience and their impact were not statistically significant predictors of helpfulness, but past helpfulness records tended to predict future helpfulness ratings.

Mean helpfulness ratings ranged from 1.7 (glucosamine) to 2.9 (prayer).

However, 74% rated at least one strategy as a 3 or 4 on the 0 4 (4 = "extremely helpful") helpfulness scale, indicating that the majority of the sample found at least one strategy that was more than moderately effective for their pain.

Concerning whether online resources help with program planning or behavior management, respondents reported on a Likert Scale of 1 – 5 (1 being the least helpful and 5 being the most helpful), an average rating of 4.3 to rate helpfulness in program planning and an average rating of 2.8 to rate helpfulness in behavior management.

Interestingly, respondents found it easier to rate helpfulness than to provide details on the number of times an event had occurred, thus the item "helpfulness" has higher rates of valid N than the item "number of times".

Participants identified current and previous-year use of 42 pain management strategies and rated helpfulness of each on a 5-point scale.

In terms of ease and helpfulness, the students rated the program an average of 4.4 for the 1st case (abdominal pain) and 4.5 for the 2nd case (headache) on a scale of 1 5, with 5 being the highest and 1 being the lowest score.

Members of the public have been found to rate the helpfulness of informal help from friends and family more highly than that of professionals ([ 4, 5]).

Fewer women allocated to structured care (n=403, 19.5%) rated staff helpfulness as less than very helpful than those allocated to usual care (n=544, 26.4%); odds ratio 0.67, 98.75% confidence interval 0.50 to 0.85.