held details

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "held details" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to information that has been retained or stored, but the phrasing is awkward and unclear. Example: "The report held details about the project's progress, but they were not clearly presented."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

It held details of progress on the development of the United States' supersonic joint strike fighter.

The Guardian

The company in question operating under the name TCA held details of some 3,300 blacklisted employees during its lifetime and managed a secret vetting system for 40 of the UK's largest construction firms.

The Guardian - Opinion

"If they are going to lay out the plan they want to pass four days in advance," he said on Fox, "What are we discussing on Thursday?" The White House has held details of Mr. Obama's bill extremely tight, leaving even top Democrats in Congress anxiously awaiting the text to be released Monday.

The New York Times - Health

It held details of construction workers and sold access to that information.

BBC

The card held details of the code and malicious program he used to gain remote control of victim's computers.

BBC

Schulman's research is impressive, tracking down old college girlfriends and distant family memBecauseut the evidence is often scanty, and the brothers themselves refused to cooperate, apart from FredericKoch Industriesto have granted a brisf audience.

Los Angeles Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

He held detailed conversations with organizers about developing and expanding programs.

The New York Times - Sports

Because we haven't had a widely held, detailed definition of what constitutes good governance, there was little by which we could judge the performance of our governments.

The Economist

American and Taiwanese officials held detailed discussions last year on a possible trade and investment framework agreement, which would be considerably narrower than a free trade agreement.

The New York Times

The envoy, Christopher R. Hill, told reporters that he had held "detailed and very substantive" talks in the North Korean capital, Pyongyang, but he would not say whether he was satisfied with the outcome.

The New York Times

The report, he said, held detailed information that was provided to the Israelis a day after the June 1 suicide bombing outside a Tel Aviv discothèque that killed 21 young people.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "held details". Instead, use more precise and grammatically sound alternatives like "contained specific information" or "stored detailed records" to ensure clarity and accuracy in your writing.

Common error

Using "held details" can sound unnatural and vague. Always opt for clearer verbs such as "contained", "included", or "stored" to enhance the readability and professionalism of your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "held details" functions as a verb-object construction, where "held" is the past tense of the verb "hold" and "details" is the object. However, as Ludwig AI points out, this phrasing is not ideal and should be replaced with more precise alternatives.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

40%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "held details" is grammatically awkward and not recommended for use in formal writing. Ludwig AI suggests using alternatives such as "contained information" or "stored detailed records" for better clarity and precision. While it appears in some News & Media contexts, it's best to opt for more professional phrasing, particularly in academic or business settings. Always prioritize clear and accurate language to ensure your message is effectively conveyed.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

contained information

Replaces "held" with "contained", emphasizing the inclusion of information within a document or system.

possessed data

Substitutes "held" with "possessed", highlighting the ownership or control of data.

included specifics

Emphasizes the presence of specific details rather than just holding them.

retained records

Focuses on the act of keeping or preserving records that include specific details.

stored information

Highlights the act of storing information for later retrieval.

documented specifics

Focuses on the act of documenting details in a written or recorded form.

kept information on file

Highlights the act of maintaining information in an organized filing system.

maintained records of

Emphasizes the ongoing effort to keep records updated and accurate.

cataloged data

Highlights the act of organizing and classifying data for easier access.

archived information

Focuses on the long-term preservation of information in an archive.

FAQs

What's a better way to say "held details"?

Consider using phrases like "contained information", "included specifics", or "stored detailed records". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is "held details" grammatically correct?

While understandable, "held details" is considered grammatically awkward. It's better to use alternatives like "contained information" or "included specifics".

How can I improve the clarity of my writing when describing stored information?

Be specific about what kind of information is being stored and use strong verbs like "documented", "retained", or "cataloged" instead of the vague "held".

What's the difference between "held details" and "contained information"?

"Contained information" is a more grammatically correct and widely accepted way to express that something includes or stores specific details. "Held details" is an awkward phrasing that should be avoided in formal writing.