Despite "dummy trials" using different step heights to limit the effectiveness of using somatosensory feedback from previous trials to determine step height, maximum toe elevation and subsequent toe clearance reduced with repetition.
The larger is the height of toe weight block, the larger the safety coefficient is.
This study numerically investigated the combined effect of reinforcement and facing stiffness, wall height, and toe resistance on the behavior of reinforced soil (RS) walls under working stress conditions.
For RS walls with vertical segmental block facing, parametric analyses showed that the combined effect of the facing stiffness, wall height, and toe resistance on the distribution of the maximum reinforcement load with depth may be limited to approximately 4 m above the base of the wall.
However, our results demonstrate very similar effects of the horizontal-vertical illusion on perceived step height and toe elevation (figures 2 and 3) under binocular and monocular vision.
The fit of shoes is defined by numerous parameters such as length, width (ball and heel), girth, and height of toe box and shape.
Incident wave height at the toe of the foreshore (H1), water depth at the structure toe (hs) and incident wave period (T) are the main parameters governing the uplift impact forces.
It shows that the length and height of the toe weight block together with the internal friction angle of the material greatly affect the stability of the dam.
Then, a parametric correction factor of the incident significant wave height at the toe of the structure is provided and included in well established design criteria.
We have therefore used high speed video recordings (250 frames/s) of EAE mice walking on a treadmill to measure 8 kinematic parameters in the sagittal plane: average hip height (1), average toe height during swing (2), and average angle and range of motion for the hip (3 4), knee (5 6) and ankle (7 8).
