Suggestions(5)
Exact(11)
Results: Mean adult height standard deviation score — midparental height standard deviation score was −1.1 for both sexes.
Study design Twelve short (height standard deviation score, −3.2 ± 0.1) non GH-deficient childrenon GH-deficientgirls) were studied at 9.3 ± 1.0 years of age.
To investigate in an open-label randomized study, the effect of two doses of growth hormone (GH) on final height and height velocity during the first 2 years of treatment of children with idiopathic short stature (mean baseline height standard deviation score [SDS] −3.2).
Compared to healthy Dutch children, mean height standard deviation score values for male and female EvC patients were −3.1 and −3.0, respectively.
Participants had a height standard deviation score (SDS) below -2, or between -1 and -2 with a predicted adult height SDS below -2, all without apparent underlying pathology.
HSDS = height standard deviation score; THSDS = target height standard deviation score Table 4 shows how many children in the correctly referred group complied with the 7 different referral criteria mentioned in the DCG (although longitudinal data were used for the analyses a child could only meet a specific referral criterion once).
Similar(49)
Auxological parameters [including height, height velocity, and their associated height standard deviation scores (HSDS)] were obtained from 39 patients.
Growth in height and weight was similarly impaired in both groups (mean weight and height standard deviation scores (SDS) ranging from −1·6 to −1·8).
After 6 months, the FP group had a decrease in Z-score (the height standard deviation scores calculated from the UK 1990 reference curves).
Weight and height standard deviation scores, adjusted for sex and age will be calculated using the LMS calculator and British 1990 growth reference standards [ 35, 36].
Height standard deviation scores (height SDS) were calculated according to sex-specific reference growth charts for the Spanish population (Carrascosa et al. 22 charts were used for subjects under ages 30 years and Hernández et al. 23 for subjects aged 30 50 years).
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com