Exact(10)
A meta-analysis of the respective results for RS-I, RS-II and GOOD revealed that the height association of rs749052 remained nominally significant (P = 0.01).
Although not statistically significant at a genome-wide level in our study, the pronounced height association observed with rs10472828 on chromosome 5p14 deserves further attention.
In fact, we regard variation in the NPPC gene as the most likely cause of the height association observed with 2q37.1, represented by both rs6717918 and rs749052.
Therefore, the seed dormancy-plant height association represents a balancing mechanism that helps maintain the genetic diversity for these two adaptive traits in natural populations.
Thus, this research established the seed dormancy-plant height association that is likely mediated by GA biosynthesis and signaling pathways in natural populations.
Genotype imputation was used to evaluate the height association of one and the same SNP across samples typed on different genotyping platforms.
Similar(50)
Since the SNPs were related to height and the associations with BMC, BMD and bone area were attenuated adjusting for height, associations between variants in the region and measures of bone mass may reflect a primary influence on longitudinal growth.
Observed height associations could reflect early-life environmental (e.g., fetal, dietary, social, hormones, and psychological circumstances) or shared genetic contributions to stature and prostate cancer risk [ 16– 16].
For SNPs genotyping, adult height associations were assessed using chi-square test (Haploview 4.0 software [ http://www.broad.mit.edu/mpg/haploview/]).edu/mpg/haploview/]
In pooled DNA typing, adult height associations with microsatellites were assessed by Fisher's exact test, with the use of 2 × 2 contingency tables for each allele.
Previous studies have generally not shown any clear differences for overall height associations by ER/PR status of the breast cancer cases (Sellers et al, 2002; Colditz et al, 2004; Rosenberg et al, 2006; Borgquist et al, 2009; John et al, 2011) in accordance with our result of no significant difference.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com