Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Success rate of hearing preservation was dependent on the level of preoperative hearing (P < 0.01) (Table 1).
Two SNPs approached sample-wide significance (pre-specified at p = 0.00014): rs12959910 in CBP80/20-dependent CBP80/20-dependenttranslation (CTinitiationeraged high factornCTIFearing (p = 0.00079, β = 0.61 dB per minor allele); and rs10492452 in L-plastin (LCP1) for averaged low frequency highing (p = 0.00056, β = 0.45 dB).
Evaluating the impact of different factors on HUI2 HRQoL scores indicated that those having developmental-behavioral conditions (problems in behavioral (p < 0.01), speech (p = 0.01), learning (p = 0.04), hearing (p < 0.01), and vision (p = 0.03)) had a significantly lower HUI2 HRQoL score.
We found lower HUI3 scores among those who had all 5 developmental-behavioral conditions (problems in behavioral (p = 0.02), speech (p < 0.01), learning (p = 0.01), hearing (p < 0.01), and vision (p < 0.01)) and among those who had at least one physical conditions (endocrine problems (p = 0.02)).
Similar(56)
More controversially, "Without vibrating, objects have sounds, but these sounds cannot be heard" (p. 4).
A single SNP lying in intron 6 of the salt-inducible kinase 3 (SIK3) gene was found to be associated with hearing PC2 (P = 3.7×10−8) and further supported by whole-genome sequence in a subset.
She could hear Ping screaming, "Help, help, help!" "We were locked inside," Yangdon said later.
"I hear P-22 is going to take a hit out on anybody who takes out P-45," one man joked as he found a seat in a barn at the Paramount Ranch, a National Park property that once belonged to the movie studio.
Also, the type of BAEP response was related to the hearing preservation (P = 0.03) and possibility to employ intraoperative BAEP was crucial for the outcome (P < 0.01).
"All I want is a fair hearing from P & O Princess shareholders.
Low birth weight was the most significant predictor of failed hearing screening (p = 7.3 × 10-10).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com