Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
Higher scores represent better health (Ware et al, 1996).
Item scores are transformed to ranges of 0 100 with higher scores indicating better mental health (Ware et al, 1993).
The SF-36 Health Survey is a validated questionnaire which provides a measure of generic health by eight health profiles including physical functioning and mental health (Ware 1993).
Self-perceived general health was measured with a four-point ordinal scale and dichotomized into good health versus less than good health (Ware et al. 1996).
Similar(56)
A questionnaire consisting of a validated self-administered patient satisfaction scale (SAPS) (Mahomed et al. 2011), an Oxford hip score (OHS) (Dawson et al. 1996), and a Short-Form 12 (SF12) health survey (Ware et al. 1996) was sent to each patient, with a cover letter, on 2 separate occasions.
A questionnaire consisting of the validated self-administered satisfaction scale (Mahomed et al. 2011), the Oxford hip score (OHS) (Dawson et al. 1996), and the Short-Form 12 health survey (Ware et al. 1996) was sent to each patient with a cover letter, and on a second occasion if necessary.
Furthermore, the patients who answered the mailed follow-up completed the SF-36 generic health survey measure (Ware 2000).
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36 Version 2.0 (SF-36v2) is a 36-item scale, which measures health-related quality of life (Ware et al, 1993, 2000).
Each study assessed self-rated health (Poor/Fair, Good, or Very Good/Excellent) (Ware et al. 1996).
The latter included a general self-rating, plus scales assessing mood, vitality, pain, activities of daily living, and limitations in social or other activities due to health problems, from the SF-36 (Ware and Sherbourne 1992).
These lock ART users into circles of obligation to adhere to treatment as a sign of gratitude to kin who have made financial sacrifices to help meet their health expenses (Binagwaho and Ratnayake, 2009; Ware et al., 2009).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com