he was tasked with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was tasked with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing someone's assignment or responsibility for a specific task or project. Example: "He was tasked with leading the team in the new marketing campaign."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was tasked with building the organization's information technology department.

The Washington Post

There, he was tasked with making public the agency's vast archive of medical data.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

He was tasked with supervising ten Indian workers who cleaned soldiers' showers and toilets.

The New Yorker

He was tasked with finding corpses in a mock-up bomb site – and found no one.

The Guardian

"He was tasked with providing some sort of ethical parameters for government work.

The New York Times

He was tasked with bringing his retail expertise to the high street banking business.

The Guardian - Business

He was tasked with recording people's reactions when they find out there is an emergency occurring.

The Washington Post

He was tasked with making forged work permits and travel documents for Jews.

The Washington Post

It's notable here that Kushner is saying he was tasked with handling contacts by foreign governments.

The Washington Post

When Mr. Joyce took control of Knight in 2002, he was tasked with cleaning up the firm.

The New York Times

As the last governor of Hong Kong, he was tasked with overseeing the handover of the colony to Chinese rule.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "he was tasked with" when you want to clearly state that someone was given a specific responsibility or duty. This phrase is suitable for formal and neutral contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "he was tasked with" if the responsibility was ambiguous or informally assigned. Opt for phrases like "he contributed to" or "he assisted with" in such cases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was tasked with" functions as a passive construction indicating assignment or responsibility. It outlines that the subject received a specific task or duty, as Ludwig examples show.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Academia

25%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Science

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "he was tasked with" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression to indicate that someone has been given a specific duty or responsibility. As confirmed by Ludwig, this phrase is appropriate for neutral to formal contexts, frequently appearing in news, academic, and general writing. Alternatives such as "he was assigned to" or "he was entrusted with" can be used to vary your language while conveying a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was assigned to

Focuses on the act of being formally assigned a duty.

he was entrusted with

Emphasizes the element of trust and responsibility given.

he was charged with

Highlights the formal responsibility or obligation.

he was given the responsibility of

Directly states the transfer of responsibility.

he was delegated to

Suggests authority was passed down to him for a task.

he was appointed to

Emphasizes a formal appointment to a role or duty.

he was commissioned to

Implies an official authorization or order for a task.

it fell to him to

Indicates the responsibility naturally devolved upon him.

he had the duty of

Highlights the obligatory nature of the assigned task.

he was given the job of

Informal way of stating the task assigned.

FAQs

What's a more formal alternative to "he was tasked with"?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases such as "he was entrusted with" or "he was charged with". These options convey a sense of responsibility and authority.

Is "he was tasked to" grammatically correct?

No, the correct construction is "he was tasked with". The preposition "with" is necessary to link the phrase to the specific task or responsibility.

How does the meaning of "he was tasked with" differ from "he was assigned to"?

"He was tasked with" implies a specific duty or responsibility, while "he was assigned to" can refer to a broader role or project. "Tasked" emphasizes the particular action required.

Can I use "he was tasked with" in informal writing?

While "he was tasked with" is suitable for neutral and formal contexts, more informal alternatives such as "he was given the job of" or "he was asked to" might be more appropriate for casual writing.