he was subsequently

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was subsequently" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to indicate that something happened after a previous event or action. Example: "After the investigation concluded, he was subsequently cleared of all charges."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

He was subsequently deported.

The Washington Post

He was subsequently cleared.

The Guardian

(He was subsequently elected to Parliament).

Independent

He was subsequently cut by the Ravens.

The New York Times - Sports

He was subsequently a British colonial official.

Encyclopedia Britannica

He was subsequently stripped of the title.

The New York Times - Sports

He was subsequently dismissed from the team.

The New York Times - Sports

He was subsequently charged with violent disorder.

The Guardian - Opinion

He was subsequently cleared of all charges.

The Guardian

He was subsequently dismissed from the force.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

He was subsequently knighted in London.

Johns Hopkins University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "he was subsequently" to clearly indicate a sequence of events, especially when the order is important for understanding the narrative or process. Ensure the context makes the chronological relationship clear.

Common error

While "he was subsequently" is grammatically correct, it can sound overly formal in casual conversation or informal writing. In such contexts, consider using simpler alternatives like "he was later" or "he was then" to maintain a more natural tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was subsequently" functions as an adverbial phrase modifying a verb, indicating the timing of an action or state in relation to a previous event. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is usable in written English. Ludwig examples showcase this in contexts such as legal, sports, and general news.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

18%

Science

17%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "he was subsequently" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to indicate a chronological sequence of events. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is correct and usable. While it is appropriate for formal writing and news reporting, simpler alternatives might be preferred in informal contexts to maintain a natural tone. Its primary function is to clarify the order in which events occurred, providing valuable context for the reader. The phrase is commonly found in news, academic and scientific sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was later

This alternative provides a more concise way to express the sequence of events, removing the formality of "subsequently".

he was afterward

Similar to "later", this option simplifies the sentence structure while retaining the meaning of a following action.

he was then

This alternative indicates a direct chronological sequence, focusing on what happened immediately after.

after that, he was

This phrase uses a connector to explicitly state the chronological order, adding a bit more emphasis.

following this, he was

This option adds formality while still clearly indicating the sequence of actions.

thereafter, he was

This alternative is more formal and less common, but it provides the same chronological connection.

subsequently, he

The phrase order is inverted, and the person is put after the word "subsequently".

in due course, he was

This alternative implies a natural or expected progression of events over time.

in the aftermath, he was

This option is used specifically when the subsequent action occurs as a result of a preceding event's consequences.

in consequence, he was

This alternative indicates that the subsequent action is a direct result or logical outcome of the first.

FAQs

What does "he was subsequently" mean?

The phrase "he was subsequently" means that after a certain event, something else happened to him. It indicates a sequence where one action or state follows another.

What can I say instead of "he was subsequently"?

You can use alternatives like "he was later", "he was afterward", or "he was then" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "he was subsequently" in formal writing?

Yes, "he was subsequently" is perfectly acceptable and often preferred in formal writing. It adds a level of precision to the timeline of events.

How does "he was subsequently" differ from "he was immediately"?

"He was subsequently" implies that there was a time gap, however short, between the two events. "He was immediately", on the other hand, means that the second event happened right away after the first.