he was submitted

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was submitted" is not correct in standard English usage.
It is typically used in contexts where someone is being presented or put forward for consideration, but it is more common to use "he was submitted for review" or similar phrases. Example: "After careful consideration, he was submitted for the award by his colleagues."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

We were looking for writers, as we always were, and he was submitted.

The New York Times

He was submitted to what he called a "shark attack" by the reception officers at Quantico.

The Guardian

The 36-year-old seemed to be on a decline when he was submitted by Jon Jones in 2012.

Independent

He was submitted to hospital but his health declined rapidly.

Wikipedia

There he was submitted to what was little more than a show trial, and – in front of a gathering of earls and barons – sentenced to death.

Wikipedia

He kept the title until UFC 46: Supernatural, when he was submitted by Hawaiian Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu specialist B.J. Penn via rear naked choke at 4 39 of the first round, in a fight he was heavily favored to win.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

He was submitting amendments for the dossier.

The Guardian

By the time he was 17 he was submitting freelance work to Detective Comics.

The New York Times - Books

He was submitting insurance claims for bogus tests and liberally writing opioid scripts.

The New York Times - Magazine

Mr. Deukmejian said he was submitting the six candidates for review by the State Bar Association.

The New York Times

Fernandes tapped Pedro on the body to signal that he was submitting.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing the act of presenting someone for consideration, specify what they were submitted for (e.g., "He was submitted for an award").

Common error

Avoid using the passive construction "he was submitted" without a clear indication of what he was submitted to or for. This usage often sounds incomplete and grammatically awkward.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was submitted" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an action was performed on the subject. However, as indicated by Ludwig AI, this phrase often sounds incomplete without a clear indication of what or where he was submitted to.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Wiki

30%

Science

30%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "he was submitted" is used, Ludwig AI identifies it as not entirely correct in standard English. Its passive construction implies that someone was presented for consideration, but the phrase often requires further context to be grammatically complete and clear. More precise alternatives, such as "he was nominated" or "he was proposed", are generally preferred. Ludwig examples suggest a neutral to informal tone, common in news and media contexts, though precise language is essential in academic or scientific writing. Specify what he was submitted for or to to improve clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was put forward

Emphasizes the act of advocating for him, pushing him into consideration.

he was presented

Focuses on the act of showcasing or introducing him, rather than the process of submitting.

he was nominated

Suggests a formal proposal for an award or position.

he was proposed

Similar to 'nominated', but can apply to a broader range of suggestions or plans.

he was referred

Highlights the act of directing him to someone or something, often for assistance or evaluation.

his application was sent

Shifts focus to the application rather than the person, specifying that the application was the thing submitted.

he was entered

Suggests participation in a contest, competition, or list.

he submitted himself

Indicates that he actively chose to be submitted.

someone submitted him

Highlights that an external entity initiated the submission.

he was tendered

Implies a formal offer or proposal, especially in a business context.

FAQs

How can I rephrase the sentence "he was submitted" to improve its clarity?

Consider using alternatives like "he was nominated", "he was proposed", or "he was put forward depending on the specific context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "he was submitted"?

While understandable, the phrase "he was submitted" is often improved by specifying the context, such as "he was submitted for review" or "he was submitted as a candidate".

What is the difference between "he was submitted" and "he submitted himself"?

"He was submitted" implies that someone else initiated the submission, while "he submitted himself" indicates that he personally took the action of submitting something on his behalf.

When is it appropriate to use the phrase "he was submitted"?

It's best to use this phrase when it's clear what he was submitted to or for. Otherwise, using alternatives like "he was recommended" or "he was proposed" can enhance clarity.