he was recognized with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was recognized with" is not correct in standard written English.
It is typically used incorrectly when referring to receiving an award or acknowledgment. Example: "He was recognized with the Employee of the Month award for his outstanding performance."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

20 human-written examples

For his dedication to Hastings College, he was recognized with an outstanding alumni award in 2002.

Cornell University

An outstanding teacher of mathematics, he was recognized with the Dean's Award for Distinguished Teaching in 1977.

Stanford University

Along with his second wife Tania, he was recognized with the Albert Einstein Award, the highest ATS honor.

The New York Times

For his work in the field of contemporary art, he was recognized with a knighthood in 1966.

Encyclopedia Britannica

A Technion Guardian, he was recognized with an honorary fellowship in 2006, and an honorary doctorate in 2011.

The New York Times

He established and managed the City Center Light Opera Company, for which he was recognized with a special Tony Award in 1957.

The New York Times - Arts

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

40 human-written examples

Just last month she was recognized with an Honorary Oscar.

Huffington Post

On the streets, he is recognized with increasing frequency, and is often greeted with pats on the back, thumbs-up signs, honks from car horns or shouts of encouragement.

The New York Times

He also was recognized with another widely used if unofficial designation, Mr. Aviation Safety.

The New York Times

He was recognized along with Jon Scheyer, Scottie Reynolds, and Greivis Vasquez for the NABC Career Achievement Awards.

Wikipedia

During his junior year, he was recognized, along with fellow future professional football player Donovan McNabb, as one of the 16 best boy athletes in the Chicago metropolitan area by the Chicago Sun-Times for his efforts in high school football, basketball and track.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use alternatives such as "he was awarded", "he received recognition for", or "he was honored for" to maintain grammatical correctness. This ensures clarity and credibility in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "he was recognized with" when describing awards or achievements. Instead, opt for more accurate and grammatically sound phrases such as "he was awarded" or "he received recognition for" to prevent misinterpretations.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was recognized with" functions as a passive construction intended to describe someone receiving an award or honor. However, according to Ludwig AI, it is not grammatically correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

41%

Academia

33%

Wiki

12%

Less common in

Science

8%

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "he was recognized with" is commonly used to indicate that someone received an award or honor. However, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect. A more accurate and professional way to express this idea is to use alternatives like "he was awarded", "he received recognition for", or "he was honored for". Although the phrase appears in various contexts, including News & Media and Academia, adopting the suggested alternatives will improve the clarity and grammatical correctness of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was awarded

Highlights the act of being given an award.

he was given an award for

Specifically mentions the act of receiving an award.

he was honored for

Stresses the respect and distinction associated with the recognition.

he was commended for

Highlights formal praise and approval.

he received recognition for

Focuses on the act of receiving recognition rather than being 'recognized with' something specific.

he was acclaimed for

Focuses on widespread praise and admiration.

he was celebrated for

Highlights the public acknowledgment and praise.

he gained accolades for

Focuses on receiving praise and awards.

he earned

Emphasizes effort and merit in gaining recognition.

he distinguished himself by

Emphasizes his unique achievements that led to recognition.

FAQs

What's a more grammatically correct way to say "he was recognized with"?

Instead of "he was recognized with", use phrases like "he was awarded", "he received recognition for", or /s/he+was+honored+for depending on the context.

How can I use "he was awarded" in a sentence?

You might say, "He was awarded the Nobel Prize for his groundbreaking research".

Is there a difference between saying "he was recognized with" and "he was honored for"?

While both indicate acknowledgment, "he was honored for" is grammatically sound, whereas "he was recognized with" is often considered incorrect. Use alternatives like /s/he+was+awarded or /s/he+received+recognition+for instead.

What are some alternatives to "he received recognition for"?

You can use alternatives such as "he was celebrated for", "he gained accolades for", or /s/he+was+commended+for depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.