he was outraged

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was outraged" is correct and commonly used in written English.
It can be used to describe a person's strong feeling of anger or indignation towards a certain situation or event. Example: "John was outraged when he found out that his boss had stolen his ideas and presented them as his own in the staff meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He was outraged.

The New Yorker

Surely he was outraged.

The New York Times

He was outraged by what was happening.

The Guardian

Mr Obama said he was "outraged" by Mr Wright's views.

The Economist

Steel said that he was outraged to have been barred.

Independent

Ray Sinclair was attending his first Passover Seder, and he was outraged.

Princeton University

He was outraged and wounded, and I believe I apologized.

The New York Times

He was outraged that no penalty was called.

The New York Times - Sports

Ambassador Noureddine Mejdoub, Tunisia's envoy, said he was outraged.

The New York Times

He was outraged by inequity and he was pretty out there.

The New York Times

When Bernstein, who is eighty, heard about what was happening to the Walters, he was outraged.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing a character's reaction, follow "he was outraged" with a specific explanation of what caused their outrage to provide context and make the reaction more understandable.

Common error

Avoid overuse of "he was outraged" in close proximity. Vary your vocabulary by using synonyms like "indignant", "furious", or descriptive phrases to maintain reader engagement and avoid monotony.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was outraged" functions as a declarative statement expressing a subject's emotional state. As Ludwig AI states, it is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase. It describes a strong feeling of anger or indignation.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Academia

15%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "he was outraged" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to express a strong feeling of anger or indignation. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and common usage. The phrase is primarily found in News & Media and Academic contexts and is considered to have a neutral register. While highly prevalent, varying your vocabulary is recommended to avoid repetition. To express similar ideas, you might consider phrases such as "he felt indignant" or "he was furious". Remember to use "he was outraged" with context to provide clarity about the situation that caused the feeling.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he expressed outrage

Shifts focus to the outward expression of the emotion rather than the internal feeling.

he was filled with indignation

Emphasizes the internal feeling of righteous anger.

he felt indignant

Replaces "outraged" with a more formal synonym, focusing on righteous anger.

he was incensed

Similar to "furious" but with a connotation of righteous anger.

he was infuriated

Similar to 'furious' and 'incensed,' suggesting a state of extreme anger.

he was furious

Conveys a more intense level of anger than "outraged".

he was deeply offended

Highlights the personal insult or disrespect felt by the individual.

he was appalled

Focuses on the shock and disgust caused by something considered morally wrong.

he was angered

A simpler, more direct way to express that someone became angry.

he took great exception to

Highlights a strong disagreement and disapproval of something.

FAQs

What does "he was outraged" mean?

The phrase "he was outraged" means that a male person felt a strong feeling of shock and anger because of something that they thought was wrong or unfair.

What can I say instead of "he was outraged"?

You can use alternatives like "he felt indignant", "he was furious", or "he was deeply offended depending on the context".

Is "he was outraged" a formal or informal expression?

The phrase "he was outraged" is considered a neutral expression, suitable for use in both formal and informal contexts. However, in very formal writing, you might opt for a more nuanced synonym like "he felt a sense of injustice".

How can I use "he was outraged" in a sentence?

You can use "he was outraged" to describe someone's reaction to an event or situation. For example, "He was outraged by the company's decision to cut employee benefits".