he was granted access

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was granted access" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that someone has been given permission to enter or use a particular resource or area. Example: "After completing the necessary security checks, he was granted access to the restricted area."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

There he was granted access to a wall full of keys and entry to any cottage he wished to shoot.

The New York Times

In March, he was granted access to a lawyer, though not the one his family chose to represent him.

The Guardian

In March, he was granted access to a lawyer, though not the one of his family's choosing.

The Guardian

While in Istanbul in 1950, Dr. Lewis had a first big break: He was granted access as the first Westerner to view the Ottoman archives.

The Washington Post

"Like the one Lord Wemyss has at Stanway: something that shoots 400 feet into the air, a ninth wonder of the world!" Forbes spent seven months filming the Duke before he was granted access to his son.

Independent

He was granted access to the crash investigation tactics used by the National Transportation Safety Board, and he commissioned an M.I.T. student to write a detailed report about what would happen to a plane and a building in such a crash.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

Any secured system (such as secure group communication) can be modeled as a capability-based access control system in which each user is given a set of secret keys of the resources he is granted access to.

Theoretical Computer Science

Cockerill has been denied involvement with the Tigers on matchday for nine games until October 9, although he is granted access to the stands, following an incident during last season's Aviva Premiership final.

Independent

If he is granted access or if the plane is parked outdoors, Mr. Hill first secures his cable lock around the propeller or the landing gear on a jet.

The New York Times

Mr. Bergman, whose client, Regina Walsh, 63, a retired railroad employee, asked that he be granted access to the court's jury selection data so that he could determine whether the process "results in the underrepresentation" of such older jurors, which, he said, would be "a violation of the fair cross-section jury requirement of the Sixth Amendment".

The New York Times

Committee member Olivier de Frouville told AFP Lula's laywers had asked for urgent action on three issues: that he be immediately freed from jail, that he be granted access to the media and his political party, and that he be allowed to run in the election.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "he was granted access", ensure the context clearly indicates who granted the access and to what. Providing specific details enhances clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "he was granted access" without specifying who granted the access. This can lead to confusion. Instead of saying "He was granted access", specify the grantor: "The administrator granted him access".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was granted access" functions as a passive construction indicating that someone received permission or the ability to enter, use, or view something. As Ludwig AI confirms, this expression is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Academia

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "he was granted access" is a grammatically correct and relatively common expression used to indicate that someone received permission or authorization to enter or use something. According to Ludwig AI, this expression is usable in written English.

It's most frequently found in news and media contexts, with supporting usage in academic and scientific writing. When using this phrase, make sure to specify who granted the access to avoid ambiguity and to ensure clarity. Alternative phrases include "he received authorization" and "he was allowed to enter". It is important to ensure clarity by specifying who granted the access to enhance understanding. The phrase has a neutral to formal register, suitable for professional and academic settings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was allowed to enter

Simplifies the phrase to a more straightforward expression of permission to enter.

he could enter

A simple and direct alternative, focusing on the ability to enter.

he had permission to proceed

Similar to 'he was allowed to enter' but with a slightly more formal tone.

he received authorization

Replaces 'granted access' with a more formal term 'authorization'.

he was authorized to proceed

Replaces 'granted access' with 'authorized to proceed', implying official approval to take action.

he was permitted entry

Substitutes 'granted access' with 'permitted entry', focusing on the act of entering.

he gained admittance

Uses 'gained admittance' to express achieving entry, implying a process to be allowed in.

he secured permission

Uses 'secured permission' to emphasize the effort in obtaining the right of entry.

he obtained clearance

Replaces 'granted access' with 'obtained clearance', suggesting the removal of restrictions.

he was given the green light

An idiomatic replacement indicating approval to proceed or enter.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "he was granted access" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, you could use phrases like "he received authorization" or "he obtained clearance", which imply a more official process.

What's a simpler way to say "he was granted access"?

Simpler alternatives include "he was allowed to enter" or "he could enter", which are more direct and easier to understand.

In what situations is it appropriate to use "he was granted access"?

The phrase "he was granted access" is appropriate in formal contexts where permission or authorization is officially given, such as accessing secure facilities, confidential information, or exclusive events.

Is "he was granted access" the same as "he had access"?

Not exactly. "He was granted access" implies that permission was given at a specific point in time, whereas "he had access" suggests a continuous state of having permission or ability to enter or use something.