Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
he was convicted
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The sentence "He was convicted" is correct and usable in written English.
You would typically use it when referring to someone who has been found guilty of a crime in a court of law. Example: After a lengthy trial, he was convicted of felony fraud and sentenced to five years in prison.
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Encyclopedias
Alternative expressions(17)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
59 human-written examples
"Convicted -- he was convicted of that".
News & Media
He was convicted.
Academia
He was convicted in June.
News & Media
He was convicted in absentia.
News & Media
He was convicted of treason and executed.
Encyclopedias
The jury didn't: he was convicted.
News & Media
(He was convicted of the second).
News & Media
He was convicted and fined $100.
Encyclopedias
He was convicted of seven counts.
News & Media
He was convicted last year and fined.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
1 human-written examples
He was convicted and sentenced to 11 years in prison.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "he was convicted", ensure that you specify the crime or offense for which he was found guilty to provide clarity and context. For example, "he was convicted of fraud".
Common error
Don't assume the reader knows what the individual was convicted of. Always specify the crime to avoid confusion or misinterpretation. Instead of just saying "he was convicted", specify the crime, such as "he was convicted of theft".
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "he was convicted" functions as a passive construction indicating a legal judgment. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is commonly used to state that someone has been found guilty of a crime in a court of law.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Academia
20%
Encyclopedias
10%
Less common in
Wiki
5%
Formal & Business
3%
Science
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "he was convicted" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase used to denote that an individual has been found guilty of a crime in a court of law. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage. It's most commonly found in news and media, academic texts, and encyclopedias. When using this phrase, clarity is crucial; specifying the crime is essential for avoiding ambiguity. Alternative expressions include "he was found guilty" and "he received a guilty verdict". While the phrase itself is neutral, ensure the context remains objective and factual.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
he was found guilty
This alternative directly states the legal verdict, emphasizing the determination of guilt.
he received a guilty verdict
This phrase focuses on the verdict itself, highlighting the outcome of the trial.
he was judged guilty
This emphasizes the act of judging and the determination of guilt by a legal authority.
he was declared guilty
This option highlights the formal declaration of guilt, often in a legal setting.
he was sentenced
This indicates the consequence of the conviction, focusing on the punishment received.
he was given a sentence
Similar to 'he was sentenced', it points towards the punishment assigned after the conviction.
the jury convicted him
This version puts emphasis on the jury as the entity delivering the guilty verdict.
he had a conviction
A more succinct way of stating that he possesses a legal record of being found guilty.
he was proven guilty
Highlights that guilt was established through evidence and legal proceedings.
he lost the case
A more general term that implies a negative legal outcome, although not specifically a criminal conviction.
FAQs
What does it mean when someone says "he was convicted"?
Saying "he was convicted" means that a court of law has found the individual guilty of a crime after a trial or a guilty plea. The conviction results in a formal judgment of guilt.
What can I say instead of "he was convicted"?
You can use alternatives like "he was found guilty", "he received a guilty verdict", or "he was judged guilty" depending on the context.
Is it necessary to specify the crime after stating "he was convicted"?
While not always grammatically required, specifying the crime after stating "he was convicted" provides crucial context and avoids ambiguity. For example, saying "he was convicted of fraud" is more informative than simply saying "he was convicted".
What is the difference between "he was arrested" and "he was convicted"?
"He was arrested" means someone was taken into custody, while "he was convicted" means a court found him guilty of a crime. Arrest is an initial step, while conviction is the final judgment.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
85%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested