he was considered

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "he was considered" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to express that someone has been thought of in a particular way by other people. Example sentence: He was considered to be one of the most influential figures of the 20th century.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

He was considered the prime suspect.

The New York Times

He was considered totally trustworthy.

The Guardian - Film

"He was considered a god.

The New Yorker

"He was considered a wizard".

The New York Times

And by 1964 he was considered unbeatable.

The Guardian - Sport

There he was considered abrasive and secretive.

The New York Times

I knew he was considered a liar".

The Guardian - Film

He was considered ethical and evenhanded.

The New York Times - Magazine

'He was considered an obscure writer.

The Guardian

He was considered among the curiosities.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Otherwise, s/he was considered as non-hypertensive.

BMC Public Health

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "he was considered" to indicate a generally held opinion or assessment, rather than a personal belief.

Common error

Avoid using "he was considered" without specifying who held that consideration. Vague attributions weaken the statement's credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was considered" functions as a passive construction, indicating that someone received a particular assessment or judgment from others. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable status, supported by numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

78%

Science

12%

Encyclopedias

5%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

1%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "he was considered" is a versatile phrase used to convey a generally held opinion or assessment about an individual. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used across various contexts. Analysis reveals that it functions as a passive construction, and it's suitable for both formal and informal writing, though it's most frequently found in news and media. Remember to provide clear context and specify who did the considering to enhance the impact of your writing. Alternatives like "he was regarded as" and "he was deemed to be" can add variety to your writing while maintaining a similar meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was regarded as

Replaces "considered" with "regarded", suggesting a more formal assessment.

he was deemed to be

Substitutes "considered" with "deemed", implying a more official judgment.

he was viewed as

Uses "viewed" instead of "considered", focusing on perception or opinion.

he was known to be

Highlights general awareness or knowledge about his qualities or traits.

he was believed to be

Emphasizes the element of belief or assumption regarding his qualities.

he was understood to be

Indicates a common understanding or interpretation of his character or abilities.

people thought of him as

Rephrases the sentence to emphasize popular opinion or general perception.

he was accepted as

Focuses on the acceptance or recognition of his role or status.

he had a reputation for being

Shifts the focus to his reputation, what he was generally known for.

it was thought that he was

Changes the sentence structure to emphasize the general consensus about him.

FAQs

How can I use "he was considered" in a sentence?

Use "he was considered" to describe a generally held opinion or assessment of someone. For instance, "He was considered a talented musician by many critics".

What are some alternatives to "he was considered"?

You can use alternatives like "he was regarded as", "he was deemed to be", or "he was viewed as" to express similar meanings.

Is it better to specify who did the considering when using "he was considered"?

Yes, specifying who held the opinion strengthens the statement. For example, "He was considered a genius by his colleagues" is more impactful than "He was considered a genius".

What's the difference between "he was considered" and "he was thought to be"?

"He was considered" implies a more formal or widespread assessment, while "he was thought to be" suggests a less formal or more speculative opinion. The choice depends on the context and the nuance you want to convey.