he was attributed with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "he was attributed with" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form is "he was attributed to" or "he was attributed as." Example: "He was attributed to the success of the project due to his innovative ideas."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Tresham's complicity was not revealed until the following day, although he was attributed with only a minor role.

Wikipedia

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In fact, he is attributed with creating the Book of Psalms, many of which he himself wrote.

Huffington Post

He's attributed with adding potatoes to the Japanese curry sauce, which according to Kanayama, helped popularize the dish in Japan.

Vice

Jacques Perconte is regarded as one of France's preeminent internet artists, but it's hard to find exactly why he's attributed with such a title.

Vice

To select mountainous watersheds, each watershed was attributed with a maximum elevation.

Ecological Processes

In other examples, a failure to give proper gas masks to workers spraying pesticides was attributed with causing serious health problems including respiratory problems, persistent coughing, blood clotting in the nose, headaches, and bouts of weakness.

Vice

ESBL- E. coli was attributed with phylogenetic group B2.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control

Indeed science was attributed with powers beyond the natural, rationale and mundane.

BMC Public Health

Reached via email, Bildt initially said that he did not dispute anything in the Dagens Nyheter report, though he noted that he had not chosen the title with which he was attributed by Fox News.

The Washington Post

And it was through his constant changing and evolving that he's been attributed with changing fashion, inspiring businesses on Wall Street, and influencing art, theatre, and television.

HuffPost

Eleven other works are attributed with some certainty to Tulsidas.

Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When ascribing something to someone, prefer the phrases "he was credited with" or "it was attributed to him" for clarity and grammatical correctness. This makes your writing more precise and easier to understand.

Common error

Avoid using "attributed with" as it is often considered grammatically incorrect. Instead, use "attributed to" or rephrase the sentence to use "credited with".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he was attributed with" functions as a passive construction where an action or quality is assigned to a subject. However, it is considered grammatically questionable. Ludwig AI indicates a preference for constructions using "to" rather than "with".

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

29%

Encyclopedias

15%

Less common in

Wiki

11%

Academia

7%

Formal & Business

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "he was attributed with" is frequently encountered across diverse sources, including news, science, and encyclopedias, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically questionable. The preferred alternative is "attributed to". Considering this grammatical concern, it's advisable to opt for alternatives like ""credited with"" or rephrasing to ensure grammatical accuracy. The high frequency suggests widespread use, but awareness of its disputed status is crucial for polished writing. For formal contexts or when aiming for precision, "attributed to" or ""credited with"" offer more reliable options.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was credited with

Replaces "attributed with" with "credited with", implying recognition for a contribution or achievement.

he was ascribed

A more formal synonym for 'attributed', suitable for academic or formal contexts. Often followed by 'to' rather than 'with'.

he was recognized for

Replaces "attributed with" with "recognized for", highlighting public acknowledgment of his qualities or actions.

he was assigned

Substitutes "attributed with" for "assigned", suggesting a task, role, or responsibility given to him.

he was identified as the creator of

Substitutes "identified as the creator of" for "attributed with", emphasizing his role in the creation of something.

he was deemed responsible for

Replaces "attributed with" with "deemed responsible for", stressing accountability for an outcome or event.

he was seen as the cause of

Uses "seen as the cause of" instead of "attributed with", indicating a causal relationship recognized by others.

he was regarded as

Replaces "attributed with" with "regarded as", showing a subjective view or opinion.

he was known for

Replaces "attributed with" with "known for", indicating something that he is generally recognized for.

he was associated with

Replaces "attributed with" with "associated with", showing a connection or link to something.

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "attribute" in a sentence?

The word "attribute" is correctly used with the preposition "to", as in "The success of the project was attributed to his leadership."

What can I say instead of "he was attributed with"?

You can use phrases like "he was "credited with"", "he was "recognized for"", or "it was "attributed to" him depending on the context.

Is it better to say "attributed to" or "attributed with"?

"Attributed to" is generally considered grammatically correct. "Attributed with" is often seen as incorrect. For example, say "The discovery was attributed to her" instead of "The discovery was attributed with her."

When should I use "credit" instead of "attribute"?

Use "credit" when you want to acknowledge someone's contribution or achievement. For example, "He was "credited with" the invention" highlights his role in creating something. "Attribute" is more general and can refer to qualities or causes.