he has signed

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of the sentence "he has signed" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that someone has applied their signature to a document. For example, "The mayor has signed the order enacting a ban on outdoor dining."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Lambert said: "He has signed, just about.

Independent

He has signed with the Atlanta Thrashers.

The New York Times - Sports

He has signed a four-year contract.

The Guardian - Sport

He has signed a six-year deal.

The Guardian - Sport

And presumably he has signed a contract.

The Guardian - Sport

He has signed a contract for his autobiography.

The New York Times - Arts

He has signed a book deal with HarperCollins.

The New York Times

(So far he has signed up nearly 35,000).

The Economist

Capaldi confirmed he has signed for a full series.

The Guardian

He has signed for Delhi Daredevils in the 2014 IPL.

The Guardian - Sport

He has signed a three-and-a-half-year deal.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When reporting news or stating facts, use "he has signed" to confirm a legally binding commitment, such as a contract or agreement.

Common error

Ensure the context clearly indicates what "he has signed". Avoid vague references that could leave the reader wondering about the specific document or agreement.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he has signed" functions as a verb phrase in the present perfect tense. It indicates that an action (signing) has been completed by a male subject, with present relevance. Ludwig's AI confirms its grammatical correctness and usability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

84%

Science

8%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "he has signed" is a grammatically sound and frequently used construction that indicates a completed action with present relevance. Primarily found in News & Media contexts, according to Ludwig, it conveys that a male subject has formally agreed to something, such as a contract or document. While versatile, clarity is essential to specify the document or agreement in question. Alternatives include "he affixed his signature" or "he officially agreed to", but these carry slightly different nuances. Overall, Ludwig AI confirms that it's an effective phrase for conveying factual information about agreements and commitments.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he affixed his signature

This alternative uses more formal language, emphasizing the act of applying a signature.

he put his name to

This phrase suggests a formal agreement or endorsement, similar to signing a document.

he officially agreed to

This alternative shifts the focus to the agreement itself, rather than the physical act of signing.

he committed to the terms

This highlights the commitment aspect of signing, emphasizing adherence to specific conditions.

he gave his assent to

A more formal and legalistic way of saying he agreed, focusing on official approval.

he entered into a contract

Focuses on the contractual nature of the agreement, rather than the signature itself.

he finalized the agreement

This alternative emphasizes the completion of the agreement process.

he endorsed the document

Highlights the act of supporting or approving the document through a signature.

he ratified the treaty

This alternative implies a formal approval process, often used in political or legal contexts.

he formally approved

This focuses on the official approval aspect, downplaying the act of signing.

FAQs

How to use "he has signed" in a sentence?

Use "he has signed" to indicate that someone has formally agreed to something, typically by writing their signature on a document. For example, "He has signed the contract, and the deal is now official."

What can I say instead of "he has signed"?

You can use alternatives like "he affixed his signature", "he put his name to", or "he officially agreed to" depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "he signed" instead of "he has signed"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "he signed" implies a completed action in the past, while "he has signed" suggests the action has relevance to the present. The choice depends on the intended nuance.

What's the difference between "he has signed" and "he will sign"?

"He has signed" indicates a completed action, whereas "he will sign" refers to a future action.