he caused

USAGE SUMMARY

"he caused" is a grammatically correct and usable part of a sentence in written English.
It can be used as a subject-verb phrase, where "he" is the subject and "caused" is the verb. Example: He caused the car to crash into the wall. In this sentence, "he" is the person who is responsible for making the car crash into the wall. Another example: The strong winds he caused blew the roof off the house. In this sentence, "he" is responsible for the strong winds that blew the roof off the house.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"He caused the whole thing.

The New York Times

He caused problems for my family".

The New York Times

I'm glad he caused it".

The New York Times - Sports

That doesn't mean he caused it.

The Washington Post

But mostly he caused much anger.

The Guardian - Books

So he caused it to be scraped".

The New York Times

Does he care that he caused offence?

The Guardian

He caused debate even in death.

The New York Times

"He caused this serious situation in Linhe.

The New York Times

He gloated over the fear he caused.

The New Yorker

He caused no more than minor injuries to passers-by.

Independent

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "he caused" to clearly establish a subject's direct responsibility for an action or event. Ensure the context provides sufficient information about the subject and the caused outcome to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "he caused" when the subject's involvement is indirect or only a contributing factor. Instead, use phrases like "he contributed to" or "he influenced" to more accurately reflect the level of causation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "he caused" functions as a subject-verb construction, indicating a causal relationship between the subject ('he') and an action or event. As Ludwig AI points out, it is a grammatically correct way to form a sentence. For example, "He caused the accident" means 'he' was directly responsible for the accident.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

90%

Science

5%

Formal & Business

3%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

0.5%

Reference

0.5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "he caused" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed phrase to denote direct causation. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness, while analysis of usage patterns reveals its prevalence in news and media. While versatile, it's important to ensure the subject's involvement is direct and significant to avoid overstating their role. Alternative phrases like "he led to" or "he brought about" offer nuanced variations for expressing causation in different contexts. Using "he caused" precisely ensures clarity and accuracy in attributing responsibility.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

he was the reason for

Directly states that he is the explanation for why something happened.

he brought about

Emphasizes a more direct and intentional act of causing something.

he led to

Suggests a chain of events where he initiated the process.

he was responsible for

Highlights accountability for the outcome.

he gave rise to

Indicates the start or emergence of something new as a result of his actions.

he contributed to

Indicates a partial influence or involvement in causing something.

he triggered

Implies a sudden and forceful initiation of an event.

he generated

Focuses on the creation or production of something, often an effect or result.

he affected

Signifies influence or impact, without necessarily implying direct causation.

he instigated

Suggests initiating an event or action, often with negative connotations.

FAQs

How can I use "he caused" in a sentence?

Use "he caused" to indicate direct causation. For example, "He caused the accident" means his actions directly led to the accident.

What are some alternatives to "he caused"?

You can use alternatives such as "he led to", "he brought about", or "he was responsible for" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always appropriate to use "he caused" to describe an event?

No, "he caused" is most appropriate when the subject's actions directly and significantly contributed to the event. For less direct influence, consider using phrases like "he influenced" or "he contributed to".

What's the difference between "he caused" and "he influenced"?

"He caused" implies a more direct and significant role in bringing about an event, whereas "he influenced" suggests a less direct or partial effect. For example, "He caused the company's downfall" suggests his actions were the primary reason, while "He influenced the company's strategy" suggests a less direct impact.