Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
he appointed for
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "he appointed for" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be an attempt to convey that someone was designated for a specific role or task, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "He appointed for the position of manager" should be rephrased for clarity, such as "He appointed him to the position of manager."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Wiki
Formal & Business
Alternative expressions(5)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
A commission he appointed for this purpose gave him an excellent bipartisan starting point; its recommendations were ignored.
News & Media
But others say the main impact of the Badillo era is that he limited access to the university and also politicized it, by calling upon Mr. Giuliani to lean on the trustees he appointed for support.
News & Media
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
57 human-written examples
Sure, Perth Glory's season didn't turn around like Lowe might've hoped, and many fans aren't happy that he was appointed for next season, but he's good fun for bored journos.
News & Media
He is appointed for an initial three-year term.
News & Media
"I don't think he was appointed for his economic competency," said Mohammad Qodari, an independent political analyst.
News & Media
It had been usual before he was appointed for the president to have a circle of close advisers, each in an important-sounding job and each competing for his ear.
News & Media
A spokesman for the trust said he was appointed for his "impressive work on safety and compassion in his time in Stafford".
News & Media
A veteran center-right politician, Temer came under fire immediately after he was appointed for naming an all-white and all-male cabinet in a country where 54percentt of the population is mixed race.
News & Media
Dewar was reappointed to Dreadnought on 28 March 1911, was promoted Commander on 22 June and on 14 December he was appointed for duty at the Royal Naval War College, Portsmouth as an instructor.
Wiki
It was Kanu's first official function after he was appointed for a third term as UNICEF Nigeria's Goodwill Ambassador.
Formal & Business
For the administration of the islands, he appointed a governor for Mahim.
Wiki
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Avoid using the phrase "he appointed for". Instead, use more grammatically correct alternatives such as "he was appointed to" or "he was designated for" to ensure clarity and professionalism in your writing.
Common error
A common mistake is using the preposition "for" after "appointed". The correct usage typically involves "to", indicating the position or task someone is appointed to, such as "He was appointed to the committee", not "He was appointed for the committee".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "he appointed for" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Its intended function is to describe the act of assigning someone to a role or task, but it fails to meet standard English grammatical conventions. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment.
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Wiki
33%
Formal & Business
34%
Less common in
Science
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "he appointed for" is considered grammatically incorrect in standard English. Ludwig AI confirms this assessment, suggesting the use of alternatives such as "he was appointed to" or "he was designated for" to ensure clarity and correctness. While the phrase might appear in various sources, its infrequent and non-standard usage makes it advisable to avoid it in both formal and informal writing. Prioritize grammatically sound alternatives to effectively convey your intended meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
he was appointed to
This is a grammatically correct and standard way to express that someone was given a specific role or position.
he was designated for
This alternative suggests a formal selection or assignment for a particular task or duty.
he was selected for
This highlights the act of choosing someone for a specific purpose or responsibility.
he was named as
This indicates that someone was officially declared or announced for a role.
he was chosen to
Focuses on the act of choosing someone for a particular task or position, implying a deliberate decision.
he was assigned to
This alternative implies that someone was given a specific task or duty as part of their responsibilities.
he was tasked with
This highlights the specific responsibility or duty that someone was given.
he was commissioned to
Suggests a formal assignment or authorization to carry out a specific task or project.
he was enlisted for
This alternative implies that someone was recruited or engaged for a specific purpose or service.
he was enrolled to
This implies that someone was registered or engaged for a specific purpose or service.
FAQs
What's the correct way to use "appoint" in a sentence?
The verb "appoint" usually requires a preposition such as "to". For example, it's correct to say "he was appointed to the position" rather than "he was appointed for the position."
What can I say instead of "he appointed for"?
You can use alternatives like "he was appointed to", "he was designated for", or "he was selected for" depending on the context.
Is "he appointed for" grammatically correct?
No, "he appointed for" is not grammatically correct. The correct phrasing typically involves using "to" after "appointed", such as in the sentence "he was appointed to the role".
How does the meaning change if I use "he appointed to" instead of "he appointed for"?
Using "he appointed to" implies a formal assignment or designation to a specific position or task, whereas "he appointed for" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't convey a clear meaning. For example, "he was appointed to" clearly indicates the assignment.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.4/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested