having started

USAGE SUMMARY

"having started" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something started in the past and is continuing up to the present. For example: "After having started as a small local business, the company now has a global presence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Having started to grow, Greece's economic recidivism is deeply frustrating.

The Economist

Having started, it is incredibly difficult to stop.

The New York Times - Magazine

The Champalous are relative newcomers, having started in 1984.

The New York Times - Food

Having started hot, he just got louder and louder.

The New York Times

Having started at 12.5%, it stood at 22% in September.

The Guardian - Business

TV Pick, having started the price war, became its victim.

The Guardian

Having started the day at -1, he ends it +9.

The Guardian - Sport

But unless they compromise, they may regret having started this battle.

The Economist

LastPass, based in Vienna, Va., is a relatively new service, having started in 2008.

The New York Times - Tech

Poulter left himself too much to do having started the day eight off the lead.

Independent

Four trials involving seven defendants are under way, two having started in January.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "having started" to clearly indicate a past action that has relevance to the present situation or outcome. This helps establish a cause-and-effect relationship within your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "having started" when a simple past tense would suffice. "Having started" implies a continuing relevance, so ensure this connection exists to prevent awkward phrasing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "having started" functions as a perfect gerund phrase. This grammatical structure typically introduces a clause that describes an action completed before another action or state, often indicating a cause-and-effect relationship as seen in Ludwig.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "having started" is a versatile phrase used to connect past actions with their present consequences. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and prevalence across varied sources. When writing, consider the temporal relationship you wish to emphasize and avoid using it when a simple past tense is sufficient. The phrase appears frequently in news and media, scientific articles, and formal business communications, making it adaptable to a wide range of writing styles.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

after beginning

Emphasizes the temporal sequence, focusing on what happens after the commencement.

once initiated

Highlights the point at which something is set into motion.

upon commencement

A more formal way of expressing the beginning of something.

from the outset

Focuses on the initial stage or starting point.

since inception

Highlights the time elapsed from the very beginning of something.

at the start

A simple and direct way of referring to the beginning.

in the beginning

Refers to the very first stage or phase of an event or process.

with the launch of

Emphasizes the act of introducing or setting something in motion.

following the start

Focuses on the events that occur after the initial action.

as of the beginning

Indicates a point in time from which something is measured or considered.

FAQs

How can I use "having started" in a sentence?

"Having started" introduces a past action that has implications for the present. For example, "Having started the project, we need to finish it on time" shows the initial action influences the need for completion.

What are some alternatives to "having started"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "after beginning", "once initiated", or "from the outset".

Is it ever incorrect to use "having started"?

Yes, if the starting action has no bearing on the current situation, using a simple past tense is more appropriate. "I started the book yesterday" is better than "Having started the book yesterday" if you're not discussing its ongoing impact.

What's the difference between "having started" and "after starting"?

"Having started" often emphasizes the consequence of the initial action, while "after starting" simply indicates a sequence of events. "Having started the business, he worked hard" implies causality, whereas "After starting the business, he hired employees" just describes the order of actions.