Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

having heard

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "having heard" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something happened after a person heard something. For example: Having heard the news about the closure of the plant, the workers began a protest.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Is he relaxed having heard the advice?

News & Media

The Guardian

About not having heard of Spielberg?

News & Media

The New Yorker

Odysseus, having heard the Sirens' song, sailed away a wiser man.

The Americans, having heard such promises before, are sceptical.

News & Media

The Economist

His son made no sign of having heard him.

News & Media

The New Yorker

You'd be forgiven for never having heard of them.

And having heard the worst, you feel less bad.

Another word he couldn't remember having heard before.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Mellon, having heard all this before, was still not interested.

News & Media

The New Yorker

Or, having heard, were they doing a "Pink"?

Amazingly, my parents gave no sign of having heard.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "having heard" to clearly establish a sequence of events where hearing something directly leads to a subsequent action or state of mind. This creates a concise and logical connection for the reader.

Common error

Avoid using "having heard" in passive constructions where the subject didn't actively hear anything. For example, instead of "The news, having heard, was acted upon", write "Having heard the news, they acted upon it" to ensure a clear and active subject.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "having heard" functions as a perfect participle phrase, modifying a noun or pronoun to indicate an action completed before another action or state. Ludwig shows its use to connect the act of hearing something with a subsequent consequence or reaction.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

45%

Academia

23%

Science

17%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the participial phrase "having heard" is grammatically correct and very common in written English, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It serves to establish a clear sequence of events where the act of hearing directly precedes and influences a subsequent action or state. Its usage spans across various registers, though it's most prevalent in news, academic, and scientific contexts. The phrase can be replaced by alternatives such as "after listening" or "once informed", depending on the desired nuance. When using "having heard", avoid passive constructions and ensure a clear subject performing the action of hearing.

FAQs

How can I use "having heard" in a sentence?

You can use "having heard" to indicate that an action or state follows directly from receiving information. For example: "Having heard the news, she decided to resign."

What are some alternatives to "having heard"?

Depending on the context, you could use alternatives like "after listening", "once informed", or "upon learning".

Which is more appropriate: "having heard" or "after hearing"?

"Having heard" often implies a more direct and immediate consequence than "after hearing". The best choice depends on whether you want to emphasize the immediacy of the result. If the result is an immediate and natural consequence of the act of hearing then "having heard" is preferable.

What's the difference between "having heard" and "being told"?

"Having heard" focuses on the act of personally receiving auditory information. "Being told" indicates receiving information from another person, regardless of how it was communicated.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

84%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: