have zero credibility

USAGE SUMMARY

'have zero credibility' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
This phrase is used when a person or organization has lost the trust of others to the point where they are not believed. For example, "Due to their long history of lies, they have zero credibility in my eyes."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

They have zero credibility as managers of anything but their own acquisitiveness.

The New York Times

Human Rights Watch's Wang said China will have "zero credibility on rule of law" as long as individuals are tortured with impunity.

The Washington Post

The influential Instapaper creator Marco Arment was more direct in his criticism: "Twitter has proven to be unstable and unpredictable and any assurances they give about whether something will be permitted in the future have zero credibility.

The New York Times

"Our friends on the left have zero credibility when it comes to reducing criminal activity and punishing those who deserve to be punished … We let the Democrats vote with us at the end of the day, but they don't get to write the bills".

The Guardian

British Foreign Secretary William Hague has said the 'self-rule' referendums in eastern Ukraine have "zero credibility" in the eyes of the world.

BBC

This support sends a message to the Kremlin's opponents: the Ukrainian authorities may dismiss the referendums as a '"farce" with "no legal weight"; Western politicians may claim the plebiscites have "zero credibility".

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

This election has zero credibility and zero democratic accountability.

The Guardian - Opinion

It's an amazing call because until he was appointed late in 2008, he had zero credibility as a coach.

The New York Times - Sports

And Patrick Comack, an analyst with Guzman & Company in Miami, remarked that "the company has zero credibility with investors at this time".

The New York Times

He said the Lib Dems had "zero credibility" because they had acted as "an accomplice" to the Tories, not as "a brake".

The Guardian

The Treasury minister David Gauke said Labour had "zero credibility when it comes to the economy" and only offered a "recipe for economic ruin.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "have zero credibility" when you want to strongly express that someone or something is completely untrustworthy or unbelievable. Ensure the context supports such a strong statement.

Common error

Avoid using "have zero credibility" in situations where a milder expression of doubt or skepticism would be more appropriate. This phrase is strong and should be reserved for situations where trust is completely absent.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have zero credibility" functions as a predicate, indicating a complete lack of believability or trustworthiness. It expresses a strong judgment about someone or something's reliability, as confirmed by Ludwig AI.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Formal & Business

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have zero credibility" is a powerful expression used to denote a complete lack of believability or trustworthiness. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely used. Predominantly found in News & Media, its purpose is to strongly discredit a subject. While the phrase is of neutral register, writers should use it judiciously, reserving it for situations where a complete absence of trust is warranted. Related phrases include "lack all credibility" or "are entirely untrustworthy", offering nuanced ways to express similar sentiments.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lack all credibility

Emphasizes the complete absence of credibility, similar to "have zero credibility".

possess no credibility

Highlights the absence of credibility as a possession or attribute.

are entirely untrustworthy

Focuses on the lack of trustworthiness as the reason for lacking credibility.

aren't at all credible

A more informal way of expressing the same idea.

hold no water

An idiomatic expression indicating that an argument or statement is not believable.

carry no weight

Indicates that statements or opinions are not influential due to a lack of credibility.

are not believable

Simply states that something cannot be believed.

cannot be trusted

Emphasizes the inability to trust someone or something.

are discredited

Highlights that credibility has been lost or taken away.

have lost all standing

Indicates a loss of reputation or authority, leading to a lack of credibility.

FAQs

How to use "have zero credibility" in a sentence?

You can use "have zero credibility" to express that someone or something is entirely unbelievable or untrustworthy. For example, "After the scandal, the politician "has zero credibility" with voters."

What can I say instead of "have zero credibility"?

You can use alternatives like "lack all credibility", "are entirely untrustworthy", or "hold no water" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to say that someone "has zero credibility"?

It's appropriate when there's a significant reason to doubt someone's honesty or reliability, often due to past actions or proven dishonesty. This is a strong statement indicating a complete lack of trust.

Is "has zero credibility" the same as saying someone is "unreliable"?

While both suggest a lack of trust, "has zero credibility" is a stronger statement. Unreliable suggests inconsistency, while "has zero credibility" indicates a complete absence of believability.