have you got

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have you got" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are asking someone if they possess something. For example: "Have you got any new ideas for the project?".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Have you got Worms?

The New Yorker

Have you got Wuppertal?

The New Yorker

Have you got one?

The New York Times

Have you got that?

Yale University

Why, what have you got?

The New York Times

"What have you got there?

The New Yorker

What else have you got?

The New Yorker

Have you got any tips?

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"Have you got any clues?

The New Yorker

What have you got done?

Independent

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Have you got Oldenburg?

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "have you got" in informal settings to inquire about possession or availability. For formal contexts, consider "do you have" or "are you in possession of".

Common error

Be careful not to use "have you got" with another negative, which can create a confusing double negative. Instead of saying "Haven't you got no money?", say "Have you got any money?" or "Don't you have any money?"

Linguistic Context

The primary grammatical function of "have you got" is to form an interrogative sentence, specifically asking whether someone possesses or has access to something. Ludwig shows numerous examples confirming its use in direct questions seeking confirmation of possession or availability.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

52%

Wiki

18%

BBC

10%

Less common in

Science

10%

Academia

5%

Formal & Business

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have you got" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used primarily in informal contexts to inquire about possession or availability. As noted by Ludwig, this phrase is widely used in news and media, and wiki type sources but less commonly found in formal academic or scientific writing, where "do you have" is preferred. When writing, be mindful of the register and opt for more formal alternatives when appropriate.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

do you have

This is a more formal and direct way of asking if someone possesses something.

have you any

This alternative is slightly more formal or archaic than the original phrase.

do you possess

This phrase is more formal and emphasizes ownership.

are you in possession of

This is a very formal and legalistic way to inquire about something someone has.

have you obtained

This suggests acquiring something, rather than simply possessing it.

do you own

This alternative specifically refers to ownership.

are you carrying

This asks if someone is currently holding or transporting something.

are you equipped with

This suggests having the necessary tools or resources.

do you control

This asks if someone has control or influence over something.

are you holding

This alternative focuses on the act of holding something at the moment of speaking.

FAQs

What's the difference between "have you got" and "do you have"?

"Have you got" is generally considered more informal than "do you have". While both phrases inquire about possession, "do you have" is often preferred in formal contexts.

Is "have you got" grammatically correct?

Yes, "have you got" is grammatically correct and widely used, especially in British English. It functions as an informal way to ask about possession or availability.

What can I say instead of "have you got"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "do you have", "do you possess", or "are you carrying".

How to use "have you got" in a sentence?

You can use "have you got" to ask if someone possesses something, for example: "Have you got any spare change?" or "Have you got the time?" It is typically used in spoken English or informal writing.