have to communicate

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have to communicate" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when expressing a necessity or obligation to convey information or messages to someone. Example: "In order to resolve the issue, we have to communicate our concerns clearly to the management."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Communication: You have to communicate verbally (talk) with one another.

WikiHow

Communication is primarily a function of the recipient so you have to communicate based on the listener.

WikiHow

You have to communicate.

The New York Times

You have to communicate smoothly.

The New York Times

But you have to communicate.

Independent

"You have to communicate with your employees.

The New York Times - Sports

You have to communicate the vision.

The New York Times

We have to communicate it".

The Guardian

You have to communicate it properly.

The Guardian

You have to communicate through a solicitor.

The Guardian

"Prisoners have to communicate and find ways to do it.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have to communicate", ensure that the context clearly indicates who needs to communicate with whom and about what. Specificity enhances clarity.

Common error

Don't simply state that people "have to communicate" without specifying the purpose or method. Unclear mandates can lead to ineffective communication and confusion.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have to communicate" functions as a verb phrase expressing obligation or necessity to convey information or interact with someone. Ludwig shows its wide applicability in diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

48%

Science

31%

Wiki

6%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Reference

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have to communicate" is a versatile phrase used to express the necessity of conveying information or interacting with others. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used across various contexts, particularly in news, science, and general writing. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying who needs to communicate with whom and about what. While acceptable in many situations, more formal or less forceful alternatives may be appropriate depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

need to communicate

Replaces "have to" with "need to", suggesting a requirement that may be less stringent than an obligation.

must communicate

Uses "must" instead of "have to", indicating a stronger sense of obligation or necessity.

are required to communicate

Formal and emphasizes the required nature of the communication.

should communicate

Suggests a recommendation or advisability rather than a strict obligation.

ought to communicate

Similar to "should communicate", indicating a moral or practical obligation, but slightly less forceful than "must".

are obliged to communicate

Emphasizes a formal or legal obligation to communicate.

are compelled to communicate

Suggests an external force or circumstance necessitates communication.

have a duty to communicate

Highlights the moral or ethical responsibility to communicate.

are bound to communicate

Indicates a commitment or agreement necessitates communication.

it is necessary to communicate

More formal and emphasizes the necessity of communication.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "have to communicate" to sound more formal?

For a more formal tone, consider using phrases like "are required to communicate", "are obliged to communicate", or "it is necessary to communicate".

What's a less forceful way to say "have to communicate"?

If you want to soften the obligation, try "should communicate" or "ought to communicate". These options suggest a recommendation rather than a strict requirement.

When is it appropriate to use "have to communicate" instead of "must communicate"?

"Have to communicate" is generally suitable for everyday situations where communication is necessary. "Must communicate" implies a stronger obligation, often used in formal or critical contexts.

What does it mean when someone says they "are compelled to communicate"?

"Are compelled to communicate" suggests that external factors or circumstances are forcing them to communicate, rather than a personal desire or choice.