Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(8)
We let the variables x v, j vand d e have the same interpretation as before.
The parameters have the same interpretation as for the concentration kernel.
Marginal regression coefficients have the same interpretation as those from an analysis using unrelated individuals.
Note that k* conveys little biological information and does not have the same interpretation as k in classic factor models.
The parameters in equation (6) have the same interpretation as in equation (2) except that they are now specific to each outcome.
The variables s e, j also have the same interpretation as before, except that e can now be any pair e = (u, v) ∈ V × V, u ≠ v.
Similar(52)
Both these graphs have the same interpretations as the corresponding single user results.
The regression coefficients have the same interpretations as in standard regression analyses, but this model include adjustment for measurement errors, as it is the underlying latent variable, and not the observed exposure which are assumed to affect the outcome.
So this 2/7, 5/7 this has the same interpretation as we had before.
The regularized t-test statistic has the same interpretation as an ordinary t-test statistic, except that the standard errors have been moderated across genes, i.e. shrunk to a common value, using a Bayesian model [9].
This has the same interpretation as an ordinary t-statistic except that the standard errors have been moderated across genes (shrunk towards a common value) using a simple Bayesian model.
More suggestions(16)
have the same perception as
have the same expression as
have the same language as
have the same view as
have the same performance as
have the same significance as
have the same approach as
have the same sentence as
have the same descent as
have the empirical interpretation as
have the same training as
have the same vision as
have the same resonance as
have the same luxury as
have the same treatment as
have the same weight as
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com