Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(3)
Hence, we have the assertion (2) of the theorem.
Thus, we have ℜ [ g ( z ) ] ≥ 0 ( z ∈ D ) and by (49) we have the assertion (46) of Theorem 9.
Solving this system with respect to λ 1 [ u ], λ 2 [ u ] and then substituting to (6), we have the assertion of this lemma.
Similar(57)
David Boies, a lawyer for Mr. Perelman, the chairman of Revlon, has asked to see a copy of the book to "have the assertions fact-checked".
Then, defining ((w^{m}=T^{[m]}(w^{0}):min{0}cupmathbb{N),}) where (w^{0}in X) is as in (3.6), and next, using a similar argument as in the proof of Theorem 3.1 for this sequence, we have the assertions.
Thus, have the second assertion.
Thus we have the following assertion.
Noting that L is a bounded self-adjoint operator, and by assumption (S0), we have the following assertion (see [18]).
where p ˜ i ∈ L ( [ a, b ] ; R ) and τ i : [ a, b ] → [ a, b ] are measurable functions, we have the following assertion.
Then we have the following assertions.
Then we have the following assertions: (1) (T_{x_{0}}^{-1}) is normed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com