have significant experience

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have significant experience" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing someone's level of expertise or background in a particular field or activity. Example: "She has significant experience in project management, having led multiple successful initiatives over the years."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

50 human-written examples

Ever fewer politicians have significant experience outside Westminster.

The Economist

You have significant experience dealing with terrorism cases.

The New York Times

"Many of us [in FE] have significant experience of working with this age group," she explains.

The Guardian

What if I'm a transfer student, and/or I already have significant experience programming in Java?

University of California, Berkeley

Candidates are expected to have significant experience with built projects and with contractors.

Yale University

All have significant experience teaching and/or professional experience in the subject areas of their courses.

University of California, Berkeley

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

10 human-written examples

The lawyer, Mr. Aguirre, has significant experience with whistle-blower cases.

The New York Times

No one on the team has significant experience in federal cases.

The New Yorker

Clinton also has significant experience in the not-for-profit sector, focusing on helping children.

The Guardian

Based on his background with Google Health, Dr. Spector has significant experience in healthcare I/T.

The Guardian

Mr. Childers has significant experience building a case against bombers based largely on forensic evidence.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When highlighting someone's qualifications, use "have significant experience" to emphasize practical knowledge and skills gained over time. It's particularly effective in professional contexts like resumes, job descriptions, and performance reviews.

Common error

Avoid using "have significant experience" if the individual's experience is relatively limited or unproven. Instead, opt for phrases like "gaining experience" or "developing skills" to accurately reflect their current level.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have significant experience" functions as a verbal phrase used to attribute a quality (experience) to a subject. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and common usage in various contexts, as demonstrated by the numerous examples provided.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

31%

News & Media

40%

Science

17%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Wiki

2%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have significant experience" is a versatile and commonly used expression to highlight an individual's or organization's qualifications based on accumulated knowledge and skills. Ludwig AI analysis confirms it's grammatically sound and frequently employed across diverse contexts, including academia, news media, science, formal business, and even wiki articles. While generally considered neutral in register, it leans toward professional use, making it suitable for resumes, reports, and job descriptions. When using the phrase, ensure the experience level is accurately represented and avoid overstating qualifications. For alternative phrasing, consider options such as "possess considerable expertise" or "demonstrate substantial proficiency" to tailor the tone and emphasis to your specific needs.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

possess considerable expertise

Replaces "have" with "possess" and "significant experience" with "considerable expertise" for a slightly more formal tone.

have a proven track record

Emphasizes past successes and accomplishments as evidence of experience.

have in-depth familiarity

Highlights a thorough and detailed understanding derived from experience.

demonstrate substantial proficiency

Shifts from possessing experience to demonstrating proficiency, emphasizing skill rather than background.

have a wealth of background

Substitutes "significant experience" with "a wealth of background" indicating a broad and rich history.

are well-versed in

Suggests a deep understanding and familiarity with a subject matter.

possess a rich history in

Emphasizes the depth and length of involvement in a particular field.

bring extensive knowledge to the table

Highlights the active contribution of knowledge, suggesting a more proactive role than simply having experience.

be highly skilled in

Focuses directly on skill level rather than accumulated experience.

command a high degree of mastery

Implies exceptional skill and control over a particular area.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "have significant experience" in a resume?

You can use phrases like "possess extensive knowledge", "demonstrate substantial proficiency", or "have a proven track record" to showcase your skills and expertise.

Is it better to say "have significant experience" or "possess significant experience"?

Both are grammatically correct and convey a similar meaning. "Possess" tends to be slightly more formal, while "have significant experience" is more commonly used in general writing.

What's the difference between "have significant experience" and "have expertise"?

"Have significant experience" implies a broader range of practical knowledge gained over time. "Have expertise" suggests a deeper, more specialized level of knowledge and skill in a particular area.

Can I use "have significant experience" to describe a company's capabilities?

Yes, you can use "have significant experience" to highlight a company's track record and expertise in a particular industry or service. For instance, "The company has significant experience in developing innovative software solutions."