have relationships with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have relationships with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe connections or associations between individuals, groups, or entities, often in a personal or professional context. Example: "Many successful businesses have relationships with their clients that foster trust and loyalty."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

57 human-written examples

"We have relationships with people.

The New York Times

We have relationships with landlords.

Harvard Business Review

We have relationships with several kosher caterers.

The New York Times - Food

"People have relationships with folks in the labor movement".

The New York Times

Peggy, does Kimberly-Clark have relationships with other NGOs?

The Guardian

All the members of the family have relationships with them.

The New York Times - Arts

They've told me they have relationships with people.

The Guardian - Music

DoubleClick, it says, does have relationships with big players.

The New York Times

"We have relationships with TV stations around the world".

The New York Times

They have relationships with their clients who want to advertise.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Do we have relationships with others?

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have relationships with", ensure the context clearly defines the type of relationship. Specify whether it's professional, personal, or strategic to provide clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "have relationships with" without specifying the nature or quality of the connection. Saying "We have relationships with customers" is less impactful than "We have strong, trusting relationships with our key customers".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have relationships with" functions as a verb phrase indicating the existence of connections or associations between individuals, groups, or entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a common and acceptable way to describe these connections.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

60%

Science

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Academia

5%

Wiki

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have relationships with" is a versatile and commonly used expression to indicate connections or associations between individuals or entities. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and widely accepted. While suitable for various contexts, including news and general discussions, it's important to specify the nature of the relationship for clarity. Consider using more formal alternatives like "maintain connections with" in professional or academic settings to enhance the impact of your writing. Remember to avoid overgeneralization by clearly defining the type and quality of the connection you are describing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

maintain connections with

Focuses on the act of preserving existing relationships.

cultivate ties with

Highlights the effort involved in developing relationships.

foster bonds with

Emphasizes the emotional aspect of creating connections.

develop associations with

Highlights the building or growth of relationships.

establish rapport with

Focuses on creating a harmonious and understanding connection.

form alliances with

Implies a strategic or cooperative relationship.

network with

Suggests a professional or social connection for mutual benefit.

affiliate with

Indicates a formal or organizational connection.

interact with

Describes general interactions or communications.

engage with

Suggests active participation or involvement.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "have relationships with" to sound more formal?

In formal contexts, consider using phrases like "maintain connections with", "cultivate ties with", or "develop associations with".

Is it always necessary to specify the type of relationship when using "have relationships with"?

While not always necessary, specifying the type of relationship (e.g. professional, personal, strategic) can provide greater clarity and impact, especially in formal or business contexts.

What's the difference between "have relationships with" and "interact with"?

"Have relationships with" implies a deeper, more established connection, while "interact with" simply refers to general communication or engagement without necessarily suggesting a strong bond.

In what contexts is it most appropriate to use the phrase "have relationships with"?

The phrase is appropriate in various contexts, including business, personal, and academic settings, where describing connections or associations between entities is relevant.