have previously recognized

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have previously recognized" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that was acknowledged or accepted in the past. Example: "The committee has previously recognized the contributions of several key members."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

Britain, France, Turkey and the Gulf Cooperation Council have previously recognized the Syrian opposition.

The New York Times

We have previously recognized reciprocity with the state of Indiana based upon the UFDA.

Harvard University

The architects of the 2011 redistricting, the three voters contend, "ignored the common rural and agricultural interests" of Coastal Plain residents that federal courts have previously recognized.

The Washington Post

Of course, we have previously recognized that an order of contempt for disobedience of a discovery order may be appealed pursuant to Code § 19.2-318.

Harvard University

We have previously recognized that courts in other jurisdictions have allowed recovery for mental distress alone for negligent mishandling of corpses.

Harvard University

War and Great Britain's gun industry played a more important role in driving the 18th-century Industrial Revolution than scholars have previously recognized, according to new research from a Stanford historian.

Stanford University

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

Critics have suggested that the ruling vitiates the complete protection of women's health that the Supreme Court had previously recognized.

The New York Times

But he is a longtime creature of the Justice Department who may decline to step outside the bounds of what the Justice Department has previously recognized as its authority.

The Washington Post

Charles of Durazzo, whom Joan had previously recognized as her heir, secured the aid of Pope Urban VI, who crowned him king of Naples in Rome (1381).

Encyclopedia Britannica

And, as this Court has previously recognized, many events, while perhaps "adversarial," are not of such a nature that an attorney can provide any special knowledge or assistance to the accused as a result of his legal expertise.

Cornell University

For this reason, the court has previously recognized that children should not be condemned to die in prison without being given a "meaningful opportunity to obtain release based on demonstrated maturity and rehabilitation".

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have previously recognized", ensure the context clearly establishes what was recognized and why it's relevant to the current discussion. For example: "The scientific community "have previously recognized" the link between smoking and lung cancer, but new research sheds light on the underlying mechanisms."

Common error

Avoid using "have previously recognized" without specifying what was recognized and by whom. Vague statements can confuse readers. Instead of saying "It "has previously recognized"," be specific: "The FDA "has previously recognized" the drug's potential side effects."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have previously recognized" functions as a present perfect verb phrase, indicating an action (recognizing) that occurred at an unspecified time before now. Ludwig AI shows that this construction is widely accepted and utilized across diverse textual contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

40%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have previously recognized" is a grammatically sound phrase used to indicate that something has been acknowledged or identified before. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage and provides numerous examples. While relatively uncommon, it finds use in academic, scientific, and news contexts. To use it effectively, ensure a clear context and specify what was recognized and by whom. Consider alternatives like "had recognized before" or "acknowledged in the past" for slightly different nuances. The expert rating is 4.3, reflecting its solid grammatical standing and authoritative usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

had recognized before

Rephrases with "had" to emphasize the completion of recognition before a certain point in time.

had already identified

Similar to "had recognized before", with "already" reinforcing the prior completion.

acknowledged in the past

Focuses on the act of acknowledgment rather than recognition, implying acceptance or awareness.

recognized before now

Emphasizes that the recognition occurred at some point before the present moment.

identified earlier

Emphasizes the act of identifying something at a prior time.

formally recognized earlier

Adds a sense of formality to the act of recognition, suggesting an official acknowledgment.

accepted in the past

Shifts focus to the acceptance of something, rather than just recognition.

noted previously

Highlights the act of making a note or observation in the past.

seen before

Less formal, implying that something was encountered or noticed in the past.

remembered from before

Focuses on the act of recalling something previously known or recognized.

FAQs

How can I use "have previously recognized" in a sentence?

Use "have previously recognized" to indicate that something has been acknowledged or identified before, like: "The scientific community "have previously acknowledged" the link between certain chemicals and health issues".

What are some alternatives to "have previously recognized"?

Alternatives include "have acknowledged before", "have noted earlier", or "have identified earlier". The best choice depends on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "have previously recognized" or "had previously recognized"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "have previously recognized" implies a present relevance or ongoing effect, while "had previously recognized" refers to a past action completed before another point in the past. The best choice depends on the timeline you're establishing.

What is the difference between "have previously recognized" and "are now recognizing"?

"Have previously recognized" indicates a past recognition that might still be valid, while "are now recognizing" implies a recent or ongoing acknowledgment. The first suggests established knowledge, the second, a shift in understanding.