"have preference over" is grammatically correct and commonly used in written English.
It means to have a greater desire or inclination towards something compared to other options. Example: I have a strong preference over spicy food rather than bland dishes. In this sentence, the speaker is expressing their liking for spicy food over other types of food.
If there is no obstacle at front, but there is an obstacle towards left or right, the heading changes diagonally accordingly, where left have preference over right (with no particular reason).
These reforms would remove the right of men to have preference over women in succession to the crown, and also remove any discrimination against Catholics.
There are two lists: one for insiders seeking to move to different apartments on the premises, who have preference over outsiders, and the other for outsiders.
If same-sex marriage becomes a cultural norm, Mr. Brown warns, heterosexual couples will no longer have preference over gay men and lesbians in adoptions, schoolchildren will be taught that same-sex parenting is normal, and those who oppose it will be labeled bigots.
Non-invasive grading or classification procedures have preference over invasive procedures like dissection or chemical analysis.
With this in mind, the use of specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors of MET may have preference over antibody-based therapy for resistant tumors, at least in the ones that are KRAS and RAF wild type, [ 3, 21, 57, 61] since METΔ7 8 is sensitive to these inhibitors [ 42].
Both sides of the market must have preferences not just over individuals but over sets; i.e. consultants have preferences over groups of students, and students have preferences over pairs of jobs.
(In these markets the preference lists which agents submit are observable, but the matching algorithm may give agents incentives to submit lists that do not faithfully reflect their preferences). The assumptions made here, although not terribly strong, nevertheless assume that hospitals have preferences over groups of students that bear a certain relation to preferences over individual students.
A Waldian may then have preferences over acts that are not in agreement with subjective expected utility but always chooses as if she was a subjective expected utility maximizer.
This result is robust to inclusion of a wide set of covariates and is consistent with a conceptual framework in which migrants have preferences over how recipients spend remittances.
The agent is not required to have preferences over artificially constructed acts or propositions that turn out to be nonsensical, given the interpretation of particular states and outcomes.
