have limited time

USAGE SUMMARY

"have limited time" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when referring to time that is restricted or limited. For example: "We have limited time to finish this project, so let's get to work!".

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

"People have limited time.

The New York Times

They have limited time.

The New Yorker

We have limited time.

Cornell University

Teachers have limited time and resources.

Harvard University

The reporter was supposed to have limited time with McChrystal.

The Guardian

We have limited time, and we have to maximize it.

The New Yorker

Most of them have limited time for outside activities anyway.

The New York Times

Decision-makers (or their advisors) have limited time.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

"We only have limited time and space," said Else.

Independent

Recruiters have limited time and do not want to read pages of waffle.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

But remember you have limited time.

Huffington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "have limited time", clearly state the reason why time is limited and what impact that limitation has on the situation.

Common error

Avoid using "have limited time" without specifying the context. Make sure to clarify whether the limited time applies to a specific task, a certain period, or a general situation.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have limited time" primarily functions as a statement indicating a constraint on the amount of time available. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread usage. Examples show it used to justify actions, explain limitations, or emphasize urgency.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

47%

Academia

24%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

4%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "have limited time" is a grammatically correct and very common phrase used to indicate that the amount of time available is restricted. Ludwig AI analysis of numerous examples confirms its validity and widespread usage across diverse contexts such as news, academia, and science. It’s crucial to use this phrase with specific context to clearly communicate the nature and impact of the time constraint. Alternatives include "time is short" or "short on time". By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "have limited time" in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

short on time

A common and straightforward way to express a lack of sufficient time.

time is restricted

This phrase indicates that there are constraints on the amount of time available.

time is short

This alternative directly states that the amount of time available is not plentiful.

lack of time

A noun phrase indicating the absence or deficiency of time.

pressed for time

Highlights the feeling of being under pressure because of a lack of time.

time constraints

Indicates that external factors or limitations are affecting the amount of time available.

time is of the essence

This phrase emphasizes the urgency and importance of using time effectively due to its scarcity.

time is at a premium

This emphasizes that time is valuable and scarce, so it should be used wisely.

under a time crunch

This phrase indicates a stressful situation due to a significant lack of time to complete a task.

a tight schedule

Describes a situation where time is carefully allocated and there is little room for delays or extra activities.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "have limited time"?

You can use alternatives like "time is short", "short on time", or "time is of the essence" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "have a limited time"?

While "have limited time" is generally correct, "have a limited amount of time" can be used for emphasis. However, "have limited time" is more concise and widely accepted.

What's the difference between "have limited time" and "are short on time"?

"Have limited time" is a general statement about a restriction on time. "Short on time" implies a more immediate or pressing lack of time.

How do I use "have limited time" in a sentence?

You can use "have limited time" to explain why you can't do something or why something needs to be done quickly. For example, "We have limited time, so we need to focus on the most important tasks."