Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
have limited coherence
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "have limited coherence" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that lacks clarity or logical connection, such as an argument, text, or idea. Example: "The report was difficult to follow because it had limited coherence, making it hard to understand the main points."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Formal & Business
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
60 human-written examples
It is interesting to note that Michelson (1918) criticized the Twyman-Green configuration as being unsuitable for the testing of large optical components, since the light sources available at the time had limited coherence length.
Wiki
Unfortunately, biomarkers selected by many current algorithms often have limited mechanistic coherence related to the specific cancer under study, partly because the approaches do not deal effectively with the challenges posed by working in high dimensional data spaces [ 9].
Science
These layered domains could be distinguished from the structures of CoOOH, NaCoOO and KCoOO layered mineral domains and were shown to have limited stacking coherence length corresponding to mixtures of 1 3 layers.
"HMRC has limited resources.
News & Media
They had limited success.
News & Media
Clearly, this has limits.
News & Media
Your body has limits.
Wiki
everything has limits!
Wiki
School has limits.
Wiki
Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) applied to the mouse retina has been limited due to inherent movement artifacts and lack of resolution.
Science
Since the coherence related to the 1st component is low and the phase is not constant in time the corresponding gain value has very limited relevance.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "have limited coherence", ensure the subject and context are clearly defined. For instance, specify what exactly is lacking coherence: "The argument presented has limited coherence."
Common error
Avoid using "have limited coherence" as a vague critique. Instead of simply stating something lacks coherence, pinpoint the specific areas where coherence is weak or missing. Be precise about what contributes to this lack of coherence.
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "have limited coherence" functions as a descriptive expression, indicating a deficiency in the logical consistency or clarity of something. It's used to assess the degree to which elements of a subject relate meaningfully. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct.
Frequent in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Less common in
Science
0%
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "have limited coherence" is used to describe something lacking in clarity or logical consistency. While Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is grammatically correct, it's best employed with specific details about what lacks coherence and why. Alternatives like ""lack coherence"" or ""exhibit poor coherence"" can provide more directness. Primarily found in neutral to formal contexts such as scientific reports or news analysis, this phrase functions to critically assess comprehensibility.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
lack coherence
This alternative is a more direct way of saying something doesn't have coherence.
possess little coherence
This alternative emphasizes the small amount of coherence present.
exhibit poor coherence
This alternative focuses on the quality of the coherence being low.
demonstrate weak coherence
This alternative highlights the feebleness or fragility of the coherence.
show a lack of cohesion
This alternative replaces "coherence" with "cohesion", emphasizing the absence of a unified structure.
display a tenuous connection
This alternative focuses on the weakness of the connection between elements.
present a disjointed structure
This alternative emphasizes the lack of smooth transitions and logical arrangement.
lack logical flow
This alternative directly addresses the absence of a sensible progression of ideas.
offer a fragmented narrative
This alternative is specific to narratives, suggesting a broken or incomplete storyline.
suffer from disorganization
This alternative points to a lack of order and structured arrangement.
FAQs
How can I use "have limited coherence" in a sentence?
You can use "have limited coherence" to describe something that lacks clarity or logical connection. For example: "The report was difficult to follow because it had limited coherence."
What can I say instead of "have limited coherence"?
You can use alternatives like "lack coherence", "exhibit poor coherence", or "demonstrate weak coherence" depending on the context.
Is it better to say "has limited coherence" or "lacks coherence"?
"Lacks coherence" is generally more concise and direct. "Has limited coherence" is acceptable but can sometimes sound more formal or academic.
What does it mean when something is described as having "limited coherence"?
It means that the thing being described doesn't quite make sense as a whole, it's difficult to follow, or its parts don't connect logically or consistently. It may "lack logical flow" or be "disjointed structure".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
77%
Authority and reliability
4.1/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested