have conversations with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have conversations with" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to engaging in discussions or dialogues with someone. Example: "I often have conversations with my colleagues about improving our workflow."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

I used to have conversations with him.

The New Yorker

"I came to have conversations with them".

The New York Times - Arts

"I can have conversations with Ukrainian taxi drivers," she adds.

Independent

Have conversations with your loved ones and neighbors.

The New York Times

But do I have conversations with my dog?

The New York Times - Science

"We continue to have conversations with his agent.

The New York Times - Sports

I have conversations with refugee leaders under a tree.

The Guardian

"You don't have conversations with people in the same room.

The New York Times - Style

He writes that he continues to have conversations with her.

The Guardian - Opinion

I have conversations with God a few times every day".

The Guardian - Music

So, I try to wake up in the morning, be connected, and have conversations with people.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for a professional tone, consider alternatives like "engage in dialogue with" instead of the more casual "have conversations with".

Common error

Avoid using "have conversations with" excessively in formal documents. Opt for more precise verbs like "discuss", "consult", or "confer" to enhance clarity and professionalism.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have conversations with" functions as a verb phrase, indicating an action of engaging in discussions or dialogues with one or more individuals. Ludwig AI affirms its usability. Examples from Ludwig show it used in various contexts, from casual talks to professional interactions.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

15%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Science

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "have conversations with" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to describe engaging in discussions or dialogues. Ludwig AI confirms its proper usage. While versatile, its suitability varies across contexts; formal settings may benefit from more precise alternatives like "engage in dialogue" or "discuss". With a high frequency of occurrence in news and media sources, "have conversations with" effectively conveys the act of exchanging ideas and information. When looking for guidance, remember that being too repetitive is a common mistake with that expression, therefore feel free to use more formal alternatives.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

talk with

A simpler and more general way to describe speaking with someone.

speak with

Similar to 'talk with', but can imply a more formal or one-way communication.

discuss with

Focuses on a specific topic being addressed during the interaction.

engage in dialogue with

Emphasizes a more formal and structured exchange of ideas.

interact with

A broader term encompassing any form of communication or engagement.

exchange views with

Highlights the sharing of opinions and perspectives.

confer with

Indicates a formal meeting or consultation to reach a decision.

consult with

Suggests seeking advice or information from someone.

interface with

Implies a more structured or professional interaction, often in a business context.

commune with

Suggests a deeper, more intimate level of communication.

FAQs

How can I use "have conversations with" in a sentence?

You can use "have conversations with" to describe engaging in discussions or dialogues with someone. For example, "I often have conversations with my colleagues about improving our workflow."

What are some alternatives to "have conversations with"?

You can use alternatives like "talk with", "discuss with", or "engage in dialogue with" depending on the context.

Which is correct: "have a conversation with" or "have conversations with"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct. "Have a conversation with" refers to a single instance of talking with someone, while "have conversations with" implies multiple instances or ongoing discussions.

Is "have conversations with" suitable for formal writing?

While grammatically correct, "have conversations with" is generally more suitable for informal or neutral contexts. For formal writing, consider alternatives like "engage in discussions with" or "confer with" to maintain a professional tone.