have comparable performance to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "have comparable performance to" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing how two things (objects, people, concepts, etc.) measure up against each other based on performance. For example: "The new model car had comparable performance to the previous model, but with greater fuel economy."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

8 human-written examples

Figure 9 shows that the algorithms perform well in terms of estimating the states and have comparable performance to the KF. Figure 10 shows us that the estimated observation from KF is near real; however, the corresponding state estimates are not near the true values.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Moreover, not only does our DSSCs have comparable performance to that of the Pt-based DSSC, but is more cost-effective.

Electrochimica Acta

From the experimental results, the image registration module proves to have comparable performance to that derived from manual drawing by experts.

Medical Engineering & Physics

Not only having minimal complexity, PRU is demonstrated experimentally to have comparable performance to GRU and LSTM over a range of modelling tasks.

Neurocomputing

A novel recursive median filter is designed using integer programming through genetic algorithm and is found to have comparable performance to neural networks with much less complexity and is better than wavelet denoising for outlier removal.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

IFN-γ-induced protein (IP -10 IP -10ressed at 100-fold hishexpressed that IFN-γ, and IP-10 release assays have comparable performance to IGRAs.

European Respiratory Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

52 human-written examples

Across both monkeys, a Kalman filter implemented using a 2000-neuron SNN has comparable performance to that of a Kalman filter implemented using standard floating point techniques.

Stanford University

A 28 nm Mg 5 nm FeTi multilayer has comparable performance to a cosputtered material with an equivalent composition (Mg 10%Fe 10%Ti), which is included as a baseline case.

Acta Materialia

The registration method has comparable performance to our previous registration technique; however, has the advantage of lower computational requirements and hence, is potentially more suitable for clinical applications.

Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology

Experimental results show that the proposed sensor has comparable performance to commercial force sensors of similar size and can be manufactured more simply and economically.

Sensors and Actuators A: Physical

Comparison between the two methods shows that the microplate assay has comparable performance to the cuvette-based assay but has the capacity to analyse many times more samples in a given run.

Journal of Neuroscience Methods

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing the performance of two or more entities, ensure that the metrics used for comparison are clearly defined and relevant to the context. For example, when comparing algorithms, specify whether you're referring to speed, accuracy, or resource usage.

Common error

Ensure that when using the phrase "have comparable performance to", you specify what aspect of performance is comparable. Unclear comparisons can lead to misinterpretations and weaken your argument.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have comparable performance to" functions as a comparative phrase, used to indicate that two or more entities exhibit similar levels of effectiveness or capability. As Ludwig AI indicates, this phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "have comparable performance to" is a grammatically sound and widely used expression to indicate that two or more entities perform at approximately the same level. According to Ludwig AI, this is a correct and usable phrase. This phrase is particularly common in scientific and academic contexts, as evidenced by the sources cited in Ludwig. While it is suitable for formal writing, ensure that the metrics for comparison are well-defined and that the aspects of performance being compared are clear to avoid any ambiguity. Alternatives like "perform similarly to" or "are on par with" can provide similar meaning with slight nuances.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

perform similarly to

Focuses on the act of performing, implying a process or action that yields comparable results.

exhibit comparable results to

Highlights the results or outcomes, suggesting that the observed data are similar.

yield equivalent outcomes to

Emphasizes the final outcomes or consequences being nearly identical.

match the performance of

Suggests that one thing is able to equal or rival another's level of achievement.

are on par with

Indicates that something is at the same level or standard as something else.

demonstrate equivalent capability to

Highlights the underlying ability or potential, suggesting equal capacity.

compete with in terms of performance

Indicates that something is able to achieve a similar output compared to something else

measure up to

Implies that something meets the standards or expectations set by something else.

equal in efficacy to

Focuses specifically on the effectiveness or potency of something being equivalent.

are in the same league as

Suggests being at a similar level of quality or excellence.

FAQs

How can I use "have comparable performance to" in a sentence?

This phrase is used to indicate that two or more things perform at a similar level. For example, "The new software "has comparable performance to" the older version, but uses less memory."

What are some alternatives to "have comparable performance to"?

Alternatives include "perform similarly to", "are on par with", or "yield equivalent outcomes to", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it always necessary to quantify "comparable performance"?

While not always strictly necessary, quantifying performance with metrics or data strengthens your argument and makes the comparison more credible. For example, instead of just saying "Method A "has comparable performance to" Method B", you could say "Method A "has comparable performance to" Method B with a 5% margin of error".

When is it appropriate to use "have comparable performance to" instead of "is better than"?

Use "have comparable performance to" when the differences in performance are negligible or not statistically significant. If one thing clearly outperforms the other, "is better than" is more appropriate.