Sentence examples for have chosen to develop from inspiring English sources

"We have chosen to develop one site at this time," she said in an e-mail, giving no elaboration.

It could have chosen to develop its own nuclear business, but decided instead to seed a Franco-German partnership.

But how manufacturers meet that mandate varies with the number of credits they have earned, and which technologies they have chosen to develop.

We have chosen to develop a new approach less complex than Otsu or others well-known dynamic methods in order to reduce the processing time [27].

The Laboratoire d'Electronique, de Technologies et d'Information (LETI) and ULIS have chosen to develop uncooled infrared sensor using a silicon technology.

Some countries have chosen to develop their own rules -- some of which are inconsistent with this convention... IATA continues to believe that in a competitive service industry like aviation, customers are best protected by the discipline of the market.

It bankrupted Mr Wilson for years.Despite these past misadventures, it is in America that Mr Wilson has chosen to develop his most ambitious project to date.

When I asked him if teams that had chosen to develop in NASL, rather than USL Pro (the lower league MLS just partnered with for reserve team play), faced a rockier road towards ultimately gaining an MLS franchise, he was careful to delineate that the partnership was purely for technical development of players.

The key difference being that Chip has actually launched and has chosen to develop its own iOS and Android chatbot app rather than relying on an existing messaging app like Facebook Messenger.

"The way the organization has chosen to develop, the messaging seems very clear: that this is primarily about charter-school expansion," Zimmer said.

Rather than respond to the ethical question of why it has chosen to develop a port in an ecologically fragile area of global significance, TATA has chosen to engage Greenpeace India and Greenpeace International in a SLAPP suit, a crude tactic employed to quash open discussion and the consumer's right to information.