have been also

USAGE SUMMARY

"have been also" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is in addition to something else that has already been mentioned. For example: We've been spending time outside exploring nature, and we've also been reading books.

✓ Grammatically correct

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

55 human-written examples

That would have been 2004".

The New Yorker

This should have been 48m.

The Economist

Could there have been 32,000?

The New York Times

We must have been 18.

The New York Times

There have been 13 executions.

The New York Times

He would have been 108.

The New York Times - Arts

It could have been 15.

The New York Times

I must have been 4.

The New York Times

(There have been 28 seasons).

The New York Times

It would have been '97 or '98.

The New York Times

There must have been 150 units.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

While grammatically correct, consider rephrasing to "have also been" for a more natural and idiomatic expression.

Common error

Avoid using "have been also" in formal writing as it can sound unnatural. Opt for more common alternatives like "have also been" to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "have been also" functions as part of a verb phrase, indicating an action or state that has occurred in addition to something else. While grammatically valid, Ludwig's AI suggests it is less common than alternative word orders.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while "have been also" is technically grammatically correct, Ludwig AI suggests it's an uncommon and potentially awkward phrasing. It's generally recommended to use the more idiomatic alternative "have also been" for clearer and more natural communication. Due to its infrequent usage, "have been also" may not be readily understood or easily found in authoritative sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

have also been

Reorders the words for a slightly different emphasis, often sounding more natural.

also have been

Modifies word order, suitable for specific syntactic structures.

have additionally been

Replaces "also" with a more formal synonym, "additionally".

have as well been

Substitutes "also" with "as well", altering the tone slightly.

have in addition been

Emphasizes the additive nature of the phrase with "in addition".

have furthermore been

Utilizes a more emphatic synonym for "also", indicating an escalation.

have moreover been

Similar to 'furthermore', suggests an additional point that reinforces the previous one.

have likewise been

Indicates similarity or correspondence, replacing "also" with "likewise".

have similarly been

Conveys a sense of parallelism or analogy, substituting "also" with "similarly".

have thus been

Implies consequence or result, changing the meaning slightly but still indicating addition.

FAQs

Is "have been also" grammatically correct?

Yes, "have been also" is grammatically correct, but it's less common and might sound awkward to native English speakers. It's generally better to use "have also been" instead.

What is a more natural-sounding alternative to "have been also"?

A more natural-sounding alternative is "have also been". This word order is more idiomatic and frequently used in English.

Can I use "have been also" in formal writing?

While grammatically correct, it's advisable to avoid "have been also" in formal writing. "Have also been" or other similar phrases would be better choices.

What difference in meaning is there between "have been also" and "have also been"?

There's virtually no difference in meaning between "have been also" and "have also been". The latter is simply more conventional and widely accepted.